10.14.2011

Friends of CBC

Since 1992 governments have left office providing less money for CBC than when they arrived. This from the friends of public broadcasting and a hat tip to David Akin, is a graph showing funding in 2011 dollars for the CBC.

Friends.ca CBC Funding


As you can see the funding has generally been declining from 1990, took a big dip from 1994 to 1997.  From 2000 to today CBC has lost about 100 million in annual funding and down almost 700 million from 1990. The biggest portion of that coming in the years 1994 to 1997.

Potentially more worrisome today are the Harper government's friends opposition to the CBC and even some Conservative ministers. The trend line is down and though I don't fear Harper will eliminate the CBC, he is likely to take this chance to hobble it with a five to ten percent cut, followed by more cuts in the future.

If you want to save the CBC, you better act and be prepared to vote in the next election.  CBC will be hanging on, but showing severe signs of stress come 2015.   Sign this petition from the Friends of Public Broadcasting below or go directly to their site here....


CBC - not loved by government

Want to protect CBC.  You can sign Bob Rae's petition if it will make you feel good. It can't hurt, it won't help either. Look at the facts as presented by David Akin's recent column.  Neither the Liberals nor the Conservatives have been kind to our beloved CBC.

In 1993 the Liberal's infamous red book said this, "A Liberal government will be committed to stable multi-year financing for national cultural institutions such as .. the CBC." (p. 88)

That was good news after the Mulroney years, a welcome sign that the next government would in fact protect the CBC from cuts.  After all the CBC was considered one of Canada's greatest cultural creations. I could go on for hours talking about the good CBC has done but then those that read my blog tend to be the choir.

The cuts to CBC by the Liberal government ended many local radio programs, closed CBC locations, meaning less local coverage and more regional coverage.  English TV was slashed with program production  reduced to Vancouver, Toronto and Halifax. Thousands of staff were laid off.  The CBC today remains under pressure to make cuts, as they have since Harper took power.  Harper and certainly much of the money behind his party, would love to sell off the CBC.  They can't do that as too many Canadians would make him pay dearly for that.  Instead he will go slowly and over time, reduce the CBC's budget.  The Liberals were no different.

Here is a summary from Maclean's Magazine of the cuts the Liberal Government made to CBC in 1994...


Phased in over the next 18 months, the cutbacks will bring to $414 million the total CBC budget reductions, which were first imposed by the Liberal government in 1994. The cuts will affect every aspect of the national broadcaster, whose current budget, including ad revenues and parliamentary disbursements, totals about $1.4 billion and includes 9,000 employees. English-language CBC Radio will lose one in three staff positions - about 500 jobs - and budget cuts will total $34 million. Program budgets for CBC Radio will drop by 28 per cent. No regional stations will close (over half the division's budget will still be spent on those stations), but their spending will be decreased according to market size. A number of programs will be cancelled. French-language radio's budget, meanwhile, will drop by $20 million, to $62 million, with 238 jobs eliminated from the existing 952, and French-language stations in Vancouver, Regina and Edmonton will be downgraded to bureaus of the main network. The French television wing will see a budget decrease of $70 million, with staff reductions of 304 employees, or 30 per cent.
The hardest hit programming area, however, is English television. Staff there will be cut by 38 per cent over the next 18 months, with 1,225 jobs lost. By April, 1998, the total budget for English TV will have fallen $171 million from 1994-1995 - 28.4 per cent - the year the current round of cuts began. As with radio, English TV will not close any regional stations, but their budgets will be severely reduced. They will produce only local news programs, revamped to emphasize current affairs and national news rather than regional events - an acknowledgment that, in most markets, the CBC's local news shows long ago lost the ratings war to private stations. On the network, arts and entertainment programming will be produced only out of Toronto, Vancouver and Halifax.


In 1994 the Liberals claimed they had to make big cuts to everything to balance the books. They justified drastic cuts to the CBC, to health care, to education, housing and other social programs.  In 2011, the Conservatives are making the same arguments. The difference is that it is a Conservative government that is cutting the budget, the results are the same.  That might be why the Liberals are now Canada's third party and why the NDP have won more provincial and federal seats in the last seven elections than the Liberals.

I know that many Liberal bloggers are passionate supporters of the CBC. I know that many of them believe the CBC was better off with them doing the cuts. I can hear them clearly stating it would have been worse if the Conservatives did it.  The facts don't support them.

If you want to save CBC, then write your MP, newspapers and get active online.  Join the Friends of Public Broadcasting.  Sign Bob Rae's petition if it will make you feel good, it can't hurt.




Interesting Fact:  You could turn on your radio almost anywhere in Canada and receive a signal from the CBC.  It was usually an AM signal.  CBC's transmitting towers relayed the signal to the remotest parts of this country.  Those same towers aided small aircraft as well.  The signals emitted from these towers assisted with air navigation in remote areas of our country.

Most small aircraft used these signals, especially in bad weather.  The towers are silent now, turned off between 1995 and 1996 for the most part.


10.12.2011

Change Wall Street

I am part of the worldwide movement for social justice that has come together due to the inspiration delivered from the Occupy Wall Street protests.  We are onto something here and it may be our last best chance to effect real change in a peaceful effort. 


This is from avaaz.org. Over 500,000 people have joined up in four days.  We need you and your friends to join 
and help sustain this effort.


----------------------------------------------


Dear friends,


Thousands of Americans have taken over Wall Street -- joining a global movement from Madrid to Jerusalem to take back democracy from corrupt interests. If millions of us stand with them, we'll boost their spirits and show the media and leaders that this is no fringe movement. Click below to sign the petition - every signature will be counted on a giant live counter in the middle of the Wall St. occupation: 

Sign the petition!
Thousands of Americans have non-violently occupied Wall St -- an epicentre of global financial power and corruption. They are the latest ray of light in a new movement for social justice that is spreading like wildfire from Madrid to Jerusalem to 146 other cities and counting, but they need our help to succeed.

As working families pay the bill for a financial crisis caused by corrupt elites, the protesters are calling for real democracy, social justice and anti-corruption. But they are under severe pressure from authorities, and some media are dismissing them as fringe groups. If millions of us from across the world stand with them, we'll boost their resolve and show the media and leaders that the protests are part of a massive mainstream movement for change. 

This year could be our century's 1968, but to succeed it must be a movement of all citizens, from every walk of life. Click to join the call for real democracy -- a giant live counter of every one of us who signs the petition will be erected in the centre of the occupation in New York, and live webcasted on the petition page:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/the_world_vs_wall_st/?vl

The worldwide wave of protest is the latest chapter in this year's story of global people power. In Egypt, people took over Tahrir Square and toppled their dictator. In India, one man's fast brought millions onto the streets and the government to its knees -- winning real action to end corruption. For months, Greek citizens relentlessly protested unfair cuts to public spending. In Spain, thousands of "indignados" defied a ban on pre-election demonstrations and mounted a protest camp in Sol square to speak out against political corruption and the government's handling of the economic crisis. And this summer across Israel, people have built "tent cities" to protest against the rising costs of housing and for social justice.

These national threads are connected by a global narrative of determination to end the collusion of corrupt elites and politicians -- who have in many countries helped cause a damaging financial crisis and now want working families to pay the bill. The mass movement that is responding can not only ensure that the burden of recession doesn't fall on the most vulnerable, it can also help right the balance of power between democracy and corruption. Click to stand with the movement:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/the_world_vs_wall_st/?vl

In every uprising, from Cairo to New York, the call for an accountable government that serves the people is clear, and our global community has backed that people power across the world wherever it has broken out. The time of politicians in the pocket of the corrupt few is ending, and in its place we are building real democracies, of, by, and for people. 

With hope,
Emma, Maria Paz, Alice, Ricken, Morgan, Brianna, Shibayan and the rest of the Avaaz team

SOURCES

Unions, students join Wall Street protesters (Businessweek)
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9Q6CA3O0.htm

Spanish youth rally in Madrid echoes Egypt protests (BBC)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13437819

Anti-austerity protesters block Greek ministries (Reuters)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/04/greece-idUSL5E7L40BV20111004

Occupy Wall St - online resources for the occupation
http://occupywallst.org/

Occupy Wall St primer (Washington Post)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/occupy-wall-street-a-primer/2011/08/25/gIQAbX7oHL_blog.html

No way Catholic Schools, no damn way!

That will be the day...

I am annoyed enough that here in Ontario my taxes pay for catholic schools.  That we have four different school boards in some communities.  One for the english and one for the french in the public system and the same in the Catholic system.

Schools, public and private have to comply with minimum standards and requirements.   Performance of community service by students is usually one of those requirements.  Giving students credit for community service because they are demonstrating out front of an abortion clinic should not be on the list of services.

Can you imagine these same catholic schools allowing students a Gay straight alliance club (GSAs)?  Do you see them considering participation in pride parades and or a demonstration for queer rights as community service?  What about students that support choice and want to stand in front of a church that is opposed to the students views?  Will the church credit these students with community service?  What would these religious schools say if the public system allowed these activities?

It hasn't happened yet.  Its a proposal in Winnipeg.  I can see our Ontario Catholic school boards drooling over the prospect that presents itself below...


WINNIPEG — Children at a private Catholic school in Winnipeg who attend anti-abortion vigils outside the city's Health Sciences Centre are receiving community service credits for their participation. 
Principal Dave Hood of Christ the King School said Tuesday that joining the vigils is a voluntary and family decision. But he's considering it as an official school activity as early as next year.
It's a prayer vigil, Hood said. "We're not there to block anyone." Hood has talked to the teacher responsible for the students' community service activities, and they've agreed that if any kids take part in the vigils, that the time would count toward a student's community service.  Christ the King School has about 200 students in kindergarten to Grade 8.

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Catholic+school+gives+credits+students+attending+anti+abortion+vigils/5536307/story.html#ixzz1aa3ZbpR8

It's more than passed the time we eliminated funding these religious recruitment centers.

10.11.2011

Topp is a Juggernaut says Nano's

So now they are calling Brian Topp's leadership effort the‘an elite juggernaut'.  How clever.  Critics of Brian Topp's effort to become NDP leader are missing quite a bit. He is well organized, prepared it would seem for a leadership contest and has a lot of people who have been leaders before or have demonstrated leadership today, on board.  I would say that's a good thing if you want to be leader.

Topp's job is not to make it easier for others to beat him.  He is running for the job that will pit the winner against Stephen Harper.  So far he has impressed me with the endorsements from people I have trusted in the past and now.

The media and I am sure some of the others seeking to become the NDP leader will want to suggest Topp is an insider, someone that has all the advantages and god or someone like her forbid, is using those connections.

I have not yet decided who to support yet. I like Brian and I am seriously considering his candidacy.  I wanted Peter Julian but he has removed himself from the running.  I also liked Megan Leslie.  Thomas Mulcair would be exciting and Nathan Cullen is fresh and vibrant.

The leadership contest will be exciting and in the end the person we choose to take on Stephen Harper better be good.  I see a number of people that would be up to the job, Topp is showing he is one of them.  Mulcair is expected to announce he will enter the leadership contest on Thursday.  That's going to be exciting and Mulcair offers something different, charisma and years as an elected MNA and MP, he too is up to the task of taking on the Harper Conservatives.

Back to the 'elite juggernaut' label coming from the media and Nik Nanos.  Topp has been instrumental in putting the NDP where they are and if that makes his campaign and candidacy for NDP leader elitist, then you don't understand the NDP.



10.04.2011

The McGuinty Greenwash

“Liberals (McGuinty) are running on their green credit but most of their spending is going to the nuclear plan, so it’s a bit of a greenwash." - Greenpeace’s Shawn-Patrick Stensil

We have heard so much about the Ontario Liberal Green Energy Act, people and the media have glossed over the McGuinty Liberal plans to drastically increase Nuclear power. In fact the Liberal's plan to spend many times more on Nuclear energy than on Green Energy. First estimates for Nuclear spending come in at 36 billion dollars. And we all know how well those estimates go. The likelihood is the cost will double to near 70 billion by the time it is all in place.

Then there is Bruce Power's wish to ship Nuclear waste via the Great Lakes. McGuinty and his government have side stepped the issue by saying it is a federal issue.  It's McGuinty and the provincial Liberal government that contract with Bruce Power to provide electricity.  They could put an end to this easily.  At the very least they could could tell the federal government they are opposed to Bruce Power shipping Nuclear waste via the Great Lakes. The risks are too great to do otherwise.

Both Hudak and McGuinty are committed to expansion of Nuclear power. The green sham being pulled over the eyes of the voters in Ontario.  As are other Liberal policies.  Currently the Liberals are expanding run of the river power projects.  These projects are small dams are privately owned and will produce electricity at an increased price. Local government have no means of stopping these projects, many of which are in conflict with local uses such as the 5,000 people that use the river that runs through Petawawa.  The plan there will see the river almost drained in order to produce power.

All of these run of the river projects will be private, are guaranteed to make a profit, have long term contracts and are likely to radically effect local ecosystems due to the limited ability for the public to and public agencies to review these projects.

Then there is the issue of gas plants.  They are better than coal but only slightly.  We need the power so some compromises have to be made until we can deliver the power we need in Ontario.  The McGuinty government sold the rights to build and operate gas plants, again with guarantees the province of Ontario would buy a certain amount of power over a period of 20 plus years.  One on the plants was to be located in Oakville.  The citizens rebelled and as the riding was held by a Liberal MPP, the McGuinty government issued a cease and desist order.  That order could cost us well over 100 million dollars.

In Mississauga another company began building a gas plant approved by the McGuinty government.  It would affect two Liberal MPPs.  The public were pissed off and it would have meant the defeat of those Liberal MPPs.  The Liberals were playing a risky game with this plant.  The company was having a difficult time raising money to build the gas plant.  They decided that it was likely to fold and they, the government would avoid a big payout for cancelling the project.

The company in Mississauga managed to find the financing and began building the plant.  Again the Liberals did nothing. They watched as the company broke ground and began building the plant in earnest.  The local community was angry and the Liberals did what they do best, released a statement to the local media saying they will stop the project.  There two more Liberal MPPs saved and this time the taxpayer will likely end up paying much more than in Oakville.  We're looking at 100's of millions of dollars in compensation.

McGuinty and Hudak are both opposed to developing 'Public Power'.  Public Power would be developed by a government owned corporation like it use to be, as it is now in BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Quebec.  Like it use to be in Ontario.

Then we have the plans for the biggest Limestone mine in Canada just north of Toronto.  So much for the greenbelt.  The project will cover over 2,000 acres, pump out over 600 million litres of water every day and then pump it back after the water has been contaminated by diesel and the residue from over 2700 lbs of explosives required each and every day.  What will that do to the ground water?  The worst part of this project is that it is class one farm land.  That means it is among the best land for farming in Canada.  And we're going to destroy it.

The Clean Water Act was again more about looking green, it isn't good enough. The pesticide legislation is far lamer than many municipalities. The McGuinty Liberals have lowered the bar and that's the wrong way to go.






McGuinty - He said it, then didn't do it...

McGuinty say lots of things and doesn't always manage to do the things he says he will or won't do, as we all know.  This from the Toronto Star today....
On Sept. 5, 2003, low in the polls, Dalton McGuinty took the main campaign plank from the NDP and promised “public power” He said at the time that, “Number one, we’ve got to keep hydro public.” Deregulation and privatization hadn’t worked, he said: “I’ve drawn a lesson from that.” He has yet to keep that promise. And the NDP was silent in the 2007 election and has been in this one about public power, although Andrea Horwath did say in the leaders’ debate that she “would rebuild hydro in the public interest.” - Paul Kahnert 

Ontario - Deficits - The Liberal and NDP Story

The Ontario Liberals talk a good game about being fiscal managers of our money.  They suggest that the NDP would spend wildly, driving the deficit even bigger.  It's not based on facts.  Its based on a myth that NDP governments can not manage the books.  Its simply not true.


If you look at the record of the Ontario Liberal party over the last eight years, you will see they have only managed to balance the books twice.  The last three budgets are the biggest in Ontario history and they are planning to run deficits for the next five years, every single one of them bigger than anything the Bob Rae government did


Ontario Liberal budgets


2003 - 2004  -5.5 billion 
2004 - 2005  -1.6 billion
2005 - 2006  -1.4 billion
2006 - 2007  +2.3 billion
2007 - 2008  +0.6 billion
2008 - 2009  -6.4 billion
2009 - 2010  -19.3 billion
2010 - 2011   -14.0 billion
2011 - 2012   -16.3 billion


Steve Paikin: “Adam [Radwanski] and I actually were both at the NDP launch of their fiscal platform this past weekend, and they do have the most modest financial promises – costed out, independently verified – of all of the four major parties.”


I don't condemn the Liberals for the deficits.  They may have been prudent.  Certainly the 2009/10 budget deficit was the right thing to do.  Where I have problems is with their rhetoric claiming the NDP would be worse managers than they are, without putting up one bit of evidence to support their assertion.  On the contrary, the evidence supports the NDP in Canada as the most fiscally successful governments. 


Coming out of the 80's recession, the NDP in Saskatchewan were the first government in Canada to balance their budget.  In the 90's, NDP governments in BC, Saskatchewan and Manitoba dealt with huge budget transfers cuts to health care from Ottawa and still managed more balanced budgets than Conservative and or Liberal provincial governments.  


A Liberal Government in BC has run the largest deficits in that province's history. In fact the  BC Liberals have run the five largest deficits in BC history in just the last ten years.  


Andrea Horwath has proposed deficits no bigger than either Hudak and McGuinty.  The NDP plan has been reviewed by competent and credible economists as fiscally sound. 


What it comes down to is priorities.  Thats why the more people hear from Andrea Horwath, the more they will look at her plan. It's been happening during the campaign.  The NDP have gone from 16% on day one to 26%.  Horwath may not win the war here, she has however put the NDP back in the game and will continue to be a significant player after the election.  It will be an entirely different election next time out. 


The Ontario NDP fiscal framework can be found here.