Ok I know it is kind of wierd but it was kinda fun!
Which Famous Homosexual Are You?
Brought to you by Rum and Monkey
3.31.2005
Which Famous Homosexual Are You? I'm Cary Grant
This was just fun. Try it see who you might be, look at who I am.
Ok I know it is kind of wierd but it was kinda fun!
Which Famous Homosexual Are You?
Brought to you by Rum and Monkey
Ok I know it is kind of wierd but it was kinda fun!
Which Famous Homosexual Are You?
Brought to you by Rum and Monkey
Release the 911 Tapes Lorne
Things are getting hot in Vancouver Burrard. Seems a couple more bits of information have been added to the Mayencourt "vigilante" escapade.
In a media release from Tim Stevenson, city councillor and NDP candidate in Vancouver Burrard pieced together the following information from media reports and witnesses of the incident;
Mayencourt was not approached by the panhandler, he watched the panhandler approaching others and decided to take action. Mayencourt then apparently followed the panhandler down Davie Street, yelling at him. The panhandler appears to have entered an alley to get away from Mayencourt. However Mayencourt followed him and shortly thereafter the panhandler hit Mayencourt on the cheek. The incident's duration of time is unknown, as is Lorne's state of mind during the confrontation.
Stevenson then went on to ask Lorne to release the 911 tapes ...
Stevenson's City Council colleague and long time advocate against homelessness, Jim Green, echoed his call. "Frankly, I'm shocked by what might have transpired between Lorne Mayencourt and the unknown panhandler." Said Green. "Lorne has been complicit with his government's cuts that have increased the number of homeless on the streets, and now he is making the streets even less safe by taking vigilante actions that only heighten the level of tension and fear between panhandlers and commuters. Perhaps we should consider an aggressive MLA by-law."
For more on Lorne Mayencourt, use the technorati search box in the sidebar.
In a media release from Tim Stevenson, city councillor and NDP candidate in Vancouver Burrard pieced together the following information from media reports and witnesses of the incident;
Mayencourt was not approached by the panhandler, he watched the panhandler approaching others and decided to take action. Mayencourt then apparently followed the panhandler down Davie Street, yelling at him. The panhandler appears to have entered an alley to get away from Mayencourt. However Mayencourt followed him and shortly thereafter the panhandler hit Mayencourt on the cheek. The incident's duration of time is unknown, as is Lorne's state of mind during the confrontation.
Stevenson then went on to ask Lorne to release the 911 tapes ...
"We are heading into a Provincial election and Lorne's constituents deserve to know what happened that night. He should request the tapes of his 911 calls be released so there is more clarity on the evening's events. As elected officials we have a responsibility to set a positive example, and that does not include harassing peaceful panhandlers."
Stevenson's City Council colleague and long time advocate against homelessness, Jim Green, echoed his call. "Frankly, I'm shocked by what might have transpired between Lorne Mayencourt and the unknown panhandler." Said Green. "Lorne has been complicit with his government's cuts that have increased the number of homeless on the streets, and now he is making the streets even less safe by taking vigilante actions that only heighten the level of tension and fear between panhandlers and commuters. Perhaps we should consider an aggressive MLA by-law."
For more on Lorne Mayencourt, use the technorati search box in the sidebar.
New West Coast Gay Internet Radio Station
New ~ West Coast Gay Internet Radio Station
Radiogay.ca gives a fresh west coast perspective on GLBT issues, locally, nationally and internationally as well as great music and chat. That is the promo stuff. I will check them out tonight.
Broadcast to be nightly from 6pm to 8pm Pacific time in their initial test phase.
This came to me by Gay Warriors yahoo group.
Radiogay.ca gives a fresh west coast perspective on GLBT issues, locally, nationally and internationally as well as great music and chat. That is the promo stuff. I will check them out tonight.
Broadcast to be nightly from 6pm to 8pm Pacific time in their initial test phase.
This came to me by Gay Warriors yahoo group.
Quesnel School District subject of Human Rights complaint
Ex-Gay believer proceeds with Human Rights Complaint against Quesnel School District
BC Human Rights tribunal has decided to go ahead with a discrimination complaint filed by high school teacher and counsellor Christopher Kempling. Kempling got into trouble over letters he wrote to the Quesnel Cariboo Observer in which among other things he claimed gays can be cured and he hoped kids that felt they were gay would talk to him.
The issue will also be before the BC Court of appeal in late April as Kempling attempts to reverse an earlier court ruling that upheld diciplinary action taken against him by the Quesnel School District and the BC College of Teachers.
BC Human Rights tribunal has decided to go ahead with a discrimination complaint filed by high school teacher and counsellor Christopher Kempling. Kempling got into trouble over letters he wrote to the Quesnel Cariboo Observer in which among other things he claimed gays can be cured and he hoped kids that felt they were gay would talk to him.
The issue will also be before the BC Court of appeal in late April as Kempling attempts to reverse an earlier court ruling that upheld diciplinary action taken against him by the Quesnel School District and the BC College of Teachers.
MALE SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ABUSE MONTH
Are you in Vancouver or planning a trip? Consider this event ...
MALE SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ABUSE MONTH FUNDRAISING EVENT
An evening of humour, music, and food sampling, with comedian Jacques Lalonde and musical talent (Leslie Mounteney, Ron Small, Candus Churchill and band) to help support the B.C. Society for Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse.
Date and Time: April 5, 7-11 pm
Location: Jupiter Café (1216 Bute)
Tickets: $20, info 604-682-6482.
MALE SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ABUSE MONTH FUNDRAISING EVENT
An evening of humour, music, and food sampling, with comedian Jacques Lalonde and musical talent (Leslie Mounteney, Ron Small, Candus Churchill and band) to help support the B.C. Society for Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse.
Date and Time: April 5, 7-11 pm
Location: Jupiter Café (1216 Bute)
Tickets: $20, info 604-682-6482.
Fools Crown for Mayencourt?
Who will it be?
My vote is for the gay "Uncle Tom," the one and only Lorne Mayencourt.
Among this year's nominees are:
Stephen Harper, Larry Campbell, Michael Jackson, Condoleeza Rice, Lorne Mayencourt, George Bush Sr., and Pope Bono the First. (previous crown holder, Lorne's daddy, Gordon Campbell, has abdicated from the throne. Seems only right Lorne should inherit his daddy's crown.)
The nominations were made by a select board under the auspices of Vancouver's official Fools' Day Committee. Competition for the Crown is fierce, as hopefuls vie for dominance after grueling weeks of training hula hooping, belly flopping, tongue twisting and pie throwing.
The Parade is also the highlight of Vancouver's annual "Foolishness Week", proclaimed by Mayor Larry Campbell for April 1st to the 8th.
Anti-gay Bishop says "I am owed an apology"
Bishop Fred Henry (CBC Photo)
The new poster boy for the anti equal-marriage folks faces a hearing before the Alberta Human Rights Commission due to his letter printed in newspapers and on the Catholic Church's website in Calgary.
"I think I'm owed an apology for putting me through this rigmarole of harassment and intimidation and attempt to silence me," Henry told the Calgary Herald.
Two complaints have been filed independently, essentially claiming the Bishop Henry attacked homosexuals in remarks he made in a letter published in the press and on the website of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Calgary in January of this year.
One of the complainants Norman Greenfield stated in the Calgary Herald, "I'm offended someone in his power would take the intolerant view to incite our politicians to go after a group of people he just doesn't agree with. My Bible says I'm not supposed to hate people."
Henry has long been opposed to gay rights. The bishop appears to long for the days when dinosaurs walked the earth and the Catholic Church practiced (they still do) the "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy on being gay. Come to church and ask forgiveness, just don't rub it in our faces.
The intolerant views have become more pronounced within the official Catholic Church of late with the Pope calling on legislators to reject same-sex marriage. The views however are out of step with most Catholics in Canada where poll after poll suggests a majority favour equal rights for gays.
Stephen Lock of Egale (Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere) in responding to the Bishop's suggestion he is owed an apology in today's Calgary Herald said, "He's not a victim here, he's not being hauled before the courts and tied to the stake here, it's a human rights complaint. His comments were hateful and harmful, and gay and lesbian people felt personally attacked by those comments. When people feel attacked, they go to the human rights commission, that's why it's there."
Watch for the social conservatives and evangelical leaders to scream persecution again. If it we're up to them, human rights commission hearings would be held in the basement of a stone church somewhere.
For more on Bishop Henry, same-sex marriage, James Dobson, evangelical, Bill c-38 and gay rights use the technorati search box in the sidebar.
3.30.2005
BC's Odd Couple, Uncle Tom and Mary
Could Polak help the Westend's Uncle Tom?
Mary Polak the former chairperson of the Surrey School Board has won the Langley Liberal nomination today in a recount by the same margin she won on March 9, 4 votes.
BC's political Odd Couple, Lorne Mayencourt and Polak will both be Liberal candidates in the May 17 election. Though Polak has a good shot at being elected, her partner, the Westend's "Uncle Tom" is not so lucky. "Uncle Tom" Lorne Mayencourt, previously known as the Westend party boi will be a one-term wonder.
Mayencourt still awaits the report of a special prosecuter into his "posse" like attempt to clean up the Westend's streets of all those unsightly panhandlers. If that doesn't go well expect the Liberals to drag out Lynne Kennedy to run. She has wanted this for some time. Or maybe the former Empress Joan-E will run. Joan-E is the ever present drag queen pumping Lorne where ever she goes. I wonder what she thinks of her man now. It must be so embarrasing pimping for this "Uncle Tom" perhaps she closes her eyes.
Should Mayencourt "escape" the special prosecuter he could ask Mary Polak to come downtown and campaign for him. Take her to The LGBT Centre Lorne, she can explain her stance against gay books in schools, I am sure if we heard it directly from her like you have that we too will understand.
When you finish there go by YouthCO, BC's award winning youth AIDS prevention and education society. Mary can explain to them why she banned them from Surrey schools.
One final thing Lorne, did you ever start paying back the people you left debts with. You promised in the last election to do this if elected. Of course you being so Ga Ga over Big Daddy Gordon I expect you have learned how to break a promise or two.
I have other questions to ask our gay Uncle Tom concerning his days with two local AIDS organizations but that will wait for another posting soon.
You can find more on Lorne Mayencourt, Mary Polak, Gordon Campbell, BC Liberals and the BC Election using the technorati search box in the sidebar.
Mary Polak the former chairperson of the Surrey School Board has won the Langley Liberal nomination today in a recount by the same margin she won on March 9, 4 votes.
BC's political Odd Couple, Lorne Mayencourt and Polak will both be Liberal candidates in the May 17 election. Though Polak has a good shot at being elected, her partner, the Westend's "Uncle Tom" is not so lucky. "Uncle Tom" Lorne Mayencourt, previously known as the Westend party boi will be a one-term wonder.
Mayencourt still awaits the report of a special prosecuter into his "posse" like attempt to clean up the Westend's streets of all those unsightly panhandlers. If that doesn't go well expect the Liberals to drag out Lynne Kennedy to run. She has wanted this for some time. Or maybe the former Empress Joan-E will run. Joan-E is the ever present drag queen pumping Lorne where ever she goes. I wonder what she thinks of her man now. It must be so embarrasing pimping for this "Uncle Tom" perhaps she closes her eyes.
Should Mayencourt "escape" the special prosecuter he could ask Mary Polak to come downtown and campaign for him. Take her to The LGBT Centre Lorne, she can explain her stance against gay books in schools, I am sure if we heard it directly from her like you have that we too will understand.
When you finish there go by YouthCO, BC's award winning youth AIDS prevention and education society. Mary can explain to them why she banned them from Surrey schools.
One final thing Lorne, did you ever start paying back the people you left debts with. You promised in the last election to do this if elected. Of course you being so Ga Ga over Big Daddy Gordon I expect you have learned how to break a promise or two.
I have other questions to ask our gay Uncle Tom concerning his days with two local AIDS organizations but that will wait for another posting soon.
You can find more on Lorne Mayencourt, Mary Polak, Gordon Campbell, BC Liberals and the BC Election using the technorati search box in the sidebar.
3.29.2005
Kempling v. The B.C. College of Teachers et al
Watch for this case coming to the BC Appeal Court April 21 and 22, 2005
Kempling v. The B.C. College of Teachers et al
Mr. Kempling appeals from the order of Justice Holmes who held that disciplinary action taken by the B.C. College of Teachers against Mr. Kempling, did not infringe his Charter rights. On this appeal, Mr. Kempling contends that Justice Holmes erred in law and misapprehended the evidence when he affirmed the conclusion of the Hearing Panel that Mr. Kempling's conduct was unprofessional and unbecoming a member of the BC College of Teachers.
Mr. Kempling ran into trouble with the BC Teachers College in the late 1990's for expressing his views in a local newspaper on homosexuality. Kempling was a high school counsellor at the time.
An example of Mr. Kempling's statements that the court found problematic included:
Kempling has become somewhat of a star among some christian conservative groups. Several have received intervener status in his case. They include the Christian Teachers Association, the Christian Legal Fellowship, Catholic Civil Rights League, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.
Kempling v. The B.C. College of Teachers et al
Mr. Kempling appeals from the order of Justice Holmes who held that disciplinary action taken by the B.C. College of Teachers against Mr. Kempling, did not infringe his Charter rights. On this appeal, Mr. Kempling contends that Justice Holmes erred in law and misapprehended the evidence when he affirmed the conclusion of the Hearing Panel that Mr. Kempling's conduct was unprofessional and unbecoming a member of the BC College of Teachers.
Mr. Kempling ran into trouble with the BC Teachers College in the late 1990's for expressing his views in a local newspaper on homosexuality. Kempling was a high school counsellor at the time.
An example of Mr. Kempling's statements that the court found problematic included:
"Some readers may be wondering why I am putting my professional reputation on the line over the homosexuality issue, and some are questioning my competence to counsel … Sexual orientations can be changed and the success rate for those who seek help is high. My hope is that students who are confused over their sexual orientation will come to see me." [August 27, 1997, Quesnel Cariboo Observer]
Kempling has become somewhat of a star among some christian conservative groups. Several have received intervener status in his case. They include the Christian Teachers Association, the Christian Legal Fellowship, Catholic Civil Rights League, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada.
Maine Senate says no to gay discrimination
Two Americas if you are Queer
Just as you think the United States has lost its "collective" mind this story comes along. Maine now headed toward equality.
Message to James Dobson: New England States are fighting back against your war of intolerance. The good people of Maine say no to your message of hate.
Three Cheers for Maine!
--------
March 28, 2005
Senate passes gay rights bill by wide margin
By Glenn Adams,Associated Press Writer
AUGUSTA, Maine --A bill that would bar discrimination against gays and lesbians in Maine won a strong vote of approval Monday in the state Senate, moving the measure to the House where a vote could be held as soon as Tuesday. The bill adding protections to the Maine Human Rights Act was approved, 25-10, after a debate in which supporters said Maine is lagging behind the other New England states by not having a law that bars discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Just as you think the United States has lost its "collective" mind this story comes along. Maine now headed toward equality.
Message to James Dobson: New England States are fighting back against your war of intolerance. The good people of Maine say no to your message of hate.
Three Cheers for Maine!
--------
March 28, 2005
Senate passes gay rights bill by wide margin
By Glenn Adams,Associated Press Writer
AUGUSTA, Maine --A bill that would bar discrimination against gays and lesbians in Maine won a strong vote of approval Monday in the state Senate, moving the measure to the House where a vote could be held as soon as Tuesday. The bill adding protections to the Maine Human Rights Act was approved, 25-10, after a debate in which supporters said Maine is lagging behind the other New England states by not having a law that bars discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
3.27.2005
First Bike for me?
My good buddy over at Gay Biker World has been trying to sell me on an HD 883 for my first bike. What do you think?
Werner Schmidt on Same-sex marriage
The following is from Hansard, the official record of the House of Commons in Canada. Schmidt has been a Member of Parliament for Kelowna - Lake Country since October 25, 1993. He recently announced he would not seek re-election after this term.
Hansard - Civil Marriage Act (C-38) debate - Werner Schmidt (CPC)
Madam Speaker, the issue of redefining marriage is one of the most significant matters that this Parliament is and will be facing for some time. Its significance lies in the fact that the definition of marriage also defines a social institution that is one of the foundations of our society. It is the institution designed to achieve the conjugal goals of sex bridging, generativity, caregiving and connecting children to their mothers and fathers. The bill before us channels marriage away from these goals. Hence, the redefinition of the word, significant as it is in its own right as a means of clear communication, also contains within it the reorganization of our society.
What is the primary source of wisdom for Canada? No, it is not the Liberals. It is not the Conservatives. It is not any political organization or person.
In the search for the source of wisdom, I discovered that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 provides the answer.
The charter begins:
Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
Following these words, the charter specifies the “guarantee of rights and freedoms”.
Consistent with this provision in the Constitution, the Speaker or Deputy Speaker on every day that Parliament is in session reads at 11 a.m. on Mondays, 10 a.m. on Tuesdays, 2 p.m. on Wednesdays and 10 a.m. on Thursdays and Fridays these words:
Almighty God, we give thanks for the great blessings which have been bestowed on Canada and its citizens, including the gifts of freedom, opportunity and peace that we enjoy. We pray for our Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth, and the Governor General. Guide us in our deliberations as Members of Parliament, and strengthen us in our awareness of our duties and responsibilities as Members. Grant us wisdom, knowledge and understanding to preserve the blessings of this country for the benefit of all and to make good laws and wise decisions. Amen.
The prayer does not specify any particular law or decision that members are called upon to make. It recognizes that members need knowledge, understanding and wisdom from God. The prayer is not just a ritual. It has meaning, particularly because it is followed by a moment of silence for personal reflection.
There is little doubt that it would change the role and function of the institution of marriage in our society. It is not obvious what those changes would be. Among the matters to be considered are answers to questions like this.
First, how will Canadian society fare when it is no longer able to offer any special recognition in law or public to a form of life so central to human experience and, indeed, to human reproduction?
Second, will a transformation of marriage into a close relationship regime continue to erode its social significance for future generations?
Third, will marriage continue to decline as the centre of gravity for men and women seeking to form a stable life together?
Fourth, will these men and women have the social and cultural supports they need to help bring children into this world and to rear a family?
Fifth, will a reconstitution of marriage ratify a reproductive revolution that will kill any public commitment to maintaining relationships between children and their natural parents?
Sixth, will it set in motion new developments that will open the way for further deregulation of marriage and parenthood?
These are some of the questions that Daniel Cere, director, Institute for the Study of Marriage, Law and Culture in Montreal, asks.
· (1335)
There are those who argue, and in fact in the House, that such questions merely complicate an already thorny issue and should not be asked. To not at least debate and try to find answers to these questions and other questions that the redefinition of marriage evokes really means that debate on the matter should be neutered. Such an argument suggests that one should simply take a position without even considering possible consequences of the position taken either for oneself or for society. Such an argument is intellectually dishonest and at best a contradiction and at worst a denial of the very foundation on which the Constitution of Canada rests.
Canadians for Equal Marriage have all the speeches made in Parliament during ther debate on the Civil Marriage Act (C-38). Click here.
Hansard - Civil Marriage Act (C-38) debate - Werner Schmidt (CPC)
Madam Speaker, the issue of redefining marriage is one of the most significant matters that this Parliament is and will be facing for some time. Its significance lies in the fact that the definition of marriage also defines a social institution that is one of the foundations of our society. It is the institution designed to achieve the conjugal goals of sex bridging, generativity, caregiving and connecting children to their mothers and fathers. The bill before us channels marriage away from these goals. Hence, the redefinition of the word, significant as it is in its own right as a means of clear communication, also contains within it the reorganization of our society.
Given the significance of the matter before us, it is incumbent upon us to apply maximum due diligence in the consideration of the issue at hand. The due diligence requires a careful study of the facts of the matter, seeking knowledge, understanding that knowledge and applying wisdom in deciding the best application of that knowledge.Wisdom must be sought; it is not achieved automatically. It requires much thought and study and includes the integration of one's beliefs and values into the making of major decisions. For us lawmakers, it also requires the integration of the culture and beliefs of our society. As lawmakers for this land, any decision that involves the redefinition and reorganization of one of our society's fundamental institutions requires the knowledge, understanding and application of the primary source of wisdom for Canada.
What is the primary source of wisdom for Canada? No, it is not the Liberals. It is not the Conservatives. It is not any political organization or person.
In the search for the source of wisdom, I discovered that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 provides the answer.
The charter begins:
Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
Following these words, the charter specifies the “guarantee of rights and freedoms”.
Consistent with this provision in the Constitution, the Speaker or Deputy Speaker on every day that Parliament is in session reads at 11 a.m. on Mondays, 10 a.m. on Tuesdays, 2 p.m. on Wednesdays and 10 a.m. on Thursdays and Fridays these words:
Almighty God, we give thanks for the great blessings which have been bestowed on Canada and its citizens, including the gifts of freedom, opportunity and peace that we enjoy. We pray for our Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth, and the Governor General. Guide us in our deliberations as Members of Parliament, and strengthen us in our awareness of our duties and responsibilities as Members. Grant us wisdom, knowledge and understanding to preserve the blessings of this country for the benefit of all and to make good laws and wise decisions. Amen.
The prayer does not specify any particular law or decision that members are called upon to make. It recognizes that members need knowledge, understanding and wisdom from God. The prayer is not just a ritual. It has meaning, particularly because it is followed by a moment of silence for personal reflection.
I expressed my personal need for wisdom from God in ultimately deciding the substance of Bill C-38. For me, the particular significance of the redefinition of marriage and exercising due diligence is the need to try to recognize and evaluate the implications and possible consequences of such a redefinition.
There is little doubt that it would change the role and function of the institution of marriage in our society. It is not obvious what those changes would be. Among the matters to be considered are answers to questions like this.
First, how will Canadian society fare when it is no longer able to offer any special recognition in law or public to a form of life so central to human experience and, indeed, to human reproduction?
Second, will a transformation of marriage into a close relationship regime continue to erode its social significance for future generations?
Third, will marriage continue to decline as the centre of gravity for men and women seeking to form a stable life together?
Fourth, will these men and women have the social and cultural supports they need to help bring children into this world and to rear a family?
Fifth, will a reconstitution of marriage ratify a reproductive revolution that will kill any public commitment to maintaining relationships between children and their natural parents?
Sixth, will it set in motion new developments that will open the way for further deregulation of marriage and parenthood?
These are some of the questions that Daniel Cere, director, Institute for the Study of Marriage, Law and Culture in Montreal, asks.
· (1335)
There are those who argue, and in fact in the House, that such questions merely complicate an already thorny issue and should not be asked. To not at least debate and try to find answers to these questions and other questions that the redefinition of marriage evokes really means that debate on the matter should be neutered. Such an argument suggests that one should simply take a position without even considering possible consequences of the position taken either for oneself or for society. Such an argument is intellectually dishonest and at best a contradiction and at worst a denial of the very foundation on which the Constitution of Canada rests.
A law that has the potential of eroding one of the foundations of our society must be considered with the utmost gravity and demands that the best thinking of which we are capable coupled with the realization that the wisdom of God must be sought in humility and sincerity.end of statement in the house
I believe that seeking wisdom from God with all our hearts will be rewarded. Let us all seek it.
I quote from Jeremiah 29:13: “...you will seek and find me when you seek me with all your heart”.
Canadians for Equal Marriage have all the speeches made in Parliament during ther debate on the Civil Marriage Act (C-38). Click here.
SOGALA Cruise
Cruise Okanagan Lake this summer! For $25 you get a four hour cruise with the boys and girls from SOGALA, the South Okanagan Gay and Lesbian Association to be held on August 13. The Okanagan in the summer is a feast for the eyes. Eye candy everywhere. There is room for only 40 people! You can get in on this event by contacting SOGALA directly at:
SOGALA
Suite 170,
113-437 Martin Street,
Penticton BC, V2A-5L1
or email
info@sogala.com
3.26.2005
Saturday night in Kelowna!
Primadonna's tonight and every Saturday night in Kelowna!
Come on out and meet some of the folks!
Every Saturday from 11pm - 2am, there is dancing at Primadonna's. There is a $5 cover charge to get in.
Open to those 19 and on.
Primadonna's is now non-smoking like just about everywhere else in BC.
Located at 1140 Harvey Avenue (at Gordon) in Kelowna.
Come on out and meet some of the folks!
Every Saturday from 11pm - 2am, there is dancing at Primadonna's. There is a $5 cover charge to get in.
Open to those 19 and on.
Primadonna's is now non-smoking like just about everywhere else in BC.
Located at 1140 Harvey Avenue (at Gordon) in Kelowna.
Okanagan Happenings
Happenings in the Okanagan for the gay, lesbian, trans, queer and bisexual folks!
NOGLO DRAG EXTRAVAGANZA & Dance
$7 members $10 non members (info)
Date: Apr 02 2005
Location: Vernon Paddle Wheel Park (map)
Contact: noglo@noglo.com or phone: 250-542-4670
Penticton SOGALA
Date: Apr 02 2005
Location: Debbie's Diner (map)
Contact: janice49@shaw.ca
SOGALA garage sale April 30
Have some old stuff lying around you don't need, perhaps you can give it to The SOGALA garage sale to be held on Saturday April 30th and Sunday May 1st from 8am to 4pm.
All proceeds to the SOGALA general fund.
Volunteers will be needed to help out for an hour or two during the sale days. Sale will be held at 487 Municipal Avenue in Penticton.
If you have any items you wish to drop off prior to the sale, please call 770-8752 or email dbolduc9@telus.net .
3.25.2005
2nd Annual BLOW OUT BASH!!!! In PG
Are you near Prince George? Planning a trip. Take in the PrideUNBC, GALA North, and the International Club bring you the 2nd Annual BLOW OUT BASH!!!!
This event was a huge success last year, and promises to be EVEN BETTER this year, so mark it on your calendars!!!
April 9th, 20051177 3rd Ave PG, (Upstairs - GALA North Hall)
Come celebrate your (temporary) escape from school, or, come relive the 'good old days'.
EVERYONE IS WELCOME TO ATTEND, so bring your friends!!!
The theme is 'school uniforms' so wear one, and you could win a prize!
Tickets are $10, and are available at: PrideUNBC, GALA North, Books and Company and XXXtreme Adult.
This event was a huge success last year, and promises to be EVEN BETTER this year, so mark it on your calendars!!!
April 9th, 20051177 3rd Ave PG, (Upstairs - GALA North Hall)
Come celebrate your (temporary) escape from school, or, come relive the 'good old days'.
EVERYONE IS WELCOME TO ATTEND, so bring your friends!!!
The theme is 'school uniforms' so wear one, and you could win a prize!
Tickets are $10, and are available at: PrideUNBC, GALA North, Books and Company and XXXtreme Adult.
Lorne Blowing Smoke
"Either he utterly failed once again to convince his Liberal colleagues for the need of his bill, or he just lied to us as he never planned to introduce the legislation in the first place. It was his usual smoke and mirrors to get his name in the paper and hope we never noticed he failed to introduce the Bill."
That was a ranter on the pages of the Westender this week. How does Lorne do it? I have yet to recall an MLA with so much of nothing going on. Someone should take him aside and say "Lorne when you make a promise, you have to keep it?"
The taxpayers paid for Lorne's trips around the province again to promote his Safe Schools Act. I guess there is one advantage to using tax money. Having Lorne outside Vancouver, the streets may be safer for panhandlers. One less liberal saving the rest of us from unsightly, untidy street people.
That was a ranter on the pages of the Westender this week. How does Lorne do it? I have yet to recall an MLA with so much of nothing going on. Someone should take him aside and say "Lorne when you make a promise, you have to keep it?"
The taxpayers paid for Lorne's trips around the province again to promote his Safe Schools Act. I guess there is one advantage to using tax money. Having Lorne outside Vancouver, the streets may be safer for panhandlers. One less liberal saving the rest of us from unsightly, untidy street people.
Gay Centre needed for BC
"Forty short years ago this summer, the RCMP questioned Everett George Klippert, a mechanic’s assistant from Saskatchewan, in connection with an arson investigation while he was working in Pine Point Northwest Territories.
Although Klippert had nothing to do with any fires, he did admit under coercive questioning to regular sex with other men. He pleaded guilty to four counts of gross indecency and was convicted on the sole basis of his own admission. He was sentenced to three years in prison. It was not the first time he’d served time for being gay."
Matt Mills is a new writer at Xtra! West and he uses this story to go onto the issue of a a home for the GLBT community in Vancouver. Vancouver has The Centre, a dark and small place on the second floor of a building on Davie and Bute.
Two weeks ago another regular contributer to Xtra! West, Philip Banks asked why he had never been asked to donate money for a "GLBT Centre" for Vancouver.
I recall how many years ago as a young gay man from Likely BC going to Vancouver for the first time to meet other gay men, I had no idea where to start. Being new I walked by many men on Davie street that I now know were gay yet in 1979 I wasn't toatally sure nor did I know how to approach them.
My resource turned out to be Little Sisters book store. They has a wall of posters of events and places in Vancouver. That gave me my start in the big city. Today it can still be an intimindating situation for many gay men of any age coming out and headed to Vancouver to meet other gay men.
A GLBT Centre would be ideal, a welcoming place that you can enter and feel at home. A place with information that I can pick up without feeling threatened. So who is starting a the campaign to get a new Centre? Who will get this off the ground?
Maybe this could become the GLBT communities number one effort. I am encouraged to see Xtra! West spend so much ink on this, now we in the communities across BC need to support an effort to get this on a roll.
Not all bad news south of the 49
Washington state nears ban on anti-gay discrimination The state Senate is said to be just a few votes shy of approving of bill that would outlaw anti-gay discrimination in hiring, housing and insurance. The measure has already passed the state House and Gov. Christine Gregoire also has indicated her support. "I appeal to you as a gay man, as a native son of this state, as your colleague, to pass this bill," said Rep. Ed Murray, D-Seattle. The Seattle Times/Associated Press
Georgia school district relents, OKs student group White County High School students prevailed in their fight to establish a club for gays and lesbians and their straight supporters at their school in Cleveland, Ga. The club has named itself Peers Rising in Diversity Education. Journal and Constitution (Atlanta)
Maine again tries to ban anti-gay bias. A bill working its way through the state legislature won approval from the Judiciary Committee yesterday, but some legislators have vowed to attach amendments that would put the measure to a statewide vote, a move Gov. John Baldacci opposes. Bangor Daily News (Maine)
from the Gay & Lesbian Leadership SmartBrief
Georgia school district relents, OKs student group White County High School students prevailed in their fight to establish a club for gays and lesbians and their straight supporters at their school in Cleveland, Ga. The club has named itself Peers Rising in Diversity Education. Journal and Constitution (Atlanta)
Maine again tries to ban anti-gay bias. A bill working its way through the state legislature won approval from the Judiciary Committee yesterday, but some legislators have vowed to attach amendments that would put the measure to a statewide vote, a move Gov. John Baldacci opposes. Bangor Daily News (Maine)
from the Gay & Lesbian Leadership SmartBrief
3.21.2005
Judging Amy to Air HIV/AIDS-themed Episode This Tuesday
As part of Peabody and Emmy Award-winning KNOW HIV/AIDS campaign, a partnership of Viacom and the Kaiser Family Foundation to foster awareness about HIV/AIDS and its prevention, CBS’s drama Judging Amy will feature an HIV-themed storyline this Tuesday night at 10:00-11:00 pm ET/PT.
The episode features a 15-year-old-girl, who Maxine (Tyne Daly) previously placed in a foster home, tests positive for HIV. After learning that the teenager is HIV positive, Maxine introduces her to Melinda Jones (Taji Coleman), 34-year old mother who contracted the virus when she was 17 and now runs a support group at a hospital.
This fall, Judging Amy executive producers, James Frawley and Carol Barbee, and supervising producer, Barry O’Brien, attended a panel discussion hosted by Kaiser as part of the KNOW HIV/AIDS campaign. During the session, the producers met panelist, Marteniz Brown, a 24-year-old man who was diagnosed with HIV at the age of 18. Brown provides support and guidance to HIV-positive youth at the Division of Adolescent Medicine Project at the Children’s Hospital of Michigan in Detroit. Brown’s incredible work with the young people inspired the producers to develop the storyline.
Additional information about the KNOW HIV AIDS campaign
The episode features a 15-year-old-girl, who Maxine (Tyne Daly) previously placed in a foster home, tests positive for HIV. After learning that the teenager is HIV positive, Maxine introduces her to Melinda Jones (Taji Coleman), 34-year old mother who contracted the virus when she was 17 and now runs a support group at a hospital.
This fall, Judging Amy executive producers, James Frawley and Carol Barbee, and supervising producer, Barry O’Brien, attended a panel discussion hosted by Kaiser as part of the KNOW HIV/AIDS campaign. During the session, the producers met panelist, Marteniz Brown, a 24-year-old man who was diagnosed with HIV at the age of 18. Brown provides support and guidance to HIV-positive youth at the Division of Adolescent Medicine Project at the Children’s Hospital of Michigan in Detroit. Brown’s incredible work with the young people inspired the producers to develop the storyline.
Additional information about the KNOW HIV AIDS campaign
3.19.2005
Social Conservatives win the day in Montreal
The Conservatives are toast. They just passed a definition of marriage that excludes same-sex couples and Harper says he will reopen star wars.
The Undoing of Stephen Harper and likely the Conservatives. Four years for Martin and the boys next election. Any bets?
The Undoing of Stephen Harper and likely the Conservatives. Four years for Martin and the boys next election. Any bets?
3.17.2005
Canadian Conservative Party harbours hate promoters and bigots
Spencer, Mayfield, Hill, Thompson, White, Kenney, the list of outspoken anti-gay MP's
In a Vancouver Sun interview, Spencer said "legalizing homosexuality was a mistake," and he said a "well-orchestrated conspiracy had worked to advance gay rights in Canada." Spencer added, "homosexuals had deliberately infiltrated North America's courts, schools, religious communities and the entertainment industry." - Vancouver Sun November 2003
Harper acted quickly and Spencer was tossed from caucus. Spencer's crime was to expose the prevalent western conservative point of view. This view is held by many Conservative MP's but not among those that voted in their ridings in BC. Many of the rural ridings held by Conservatives would have close to a majority opposed to same-sex marriage, yet Conservatives represent areas like Burnaby, Surrey, Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, New Westminister, North and West Vancouver, the Gulf Islands all areas which would generally be more agreeable to supporting same-sex marriage than opposed to it.
Polls in BC have shown consistently that 60% of the people here support same-sex marriage. Yet with a gazillion conservative MP's surely some of them will be voting the way their constituents want them too and that would mean they would support same sex marriage. Thats not happening in BC. All but one Conservative MP is voting against the measure. Every last one of them will be lying through their teeth when they say their constituents are very much opposed to Bill 38.
I am sure they will have a comparison of emails, letters and returned surveys to back them up. All of these are unscientific measures of support. The Harper Conservatives are playing the same silly numbers game they have been for years under the Reform and Alliance banners. This likely why they will not get to Parliament in numbers to give Harper the keys to 24 Sussex Drive.
Adding to the Conservatives problems is Grant Hill from Okotoks, Alberta. Hill has the MP's pension he said he would never collect, how soon their memories go. This frees him up to say what he really thinks about gays. Here is what he told MacLeans Magazine;
"... that the homosexual lifestyle includes "distinct health negatives"; that those with an "unwanted sexual preference" can choose to change it; and that children do best when raised by straight couples. "My position is based on science, on social science, my experience as a doctor and all the data and literature that I review in a scientific way." (is there another way?)
He says more ...
"You know, there are very distinct health negatives to the gay lifestyle," he said, repeating views he made known in a Commons speech in 1996 that made him a prime target for social progressives and gay activists.
Asked to elaborate Wednesday, he said: "AIDS. AIDS in North America is 85 per cent a disease of those (men) who have sex with men."
Will Grant Hill now be sent packing by the Conservatives? Will Harper accept Hill speaking out like this? If he does what's the difference between Hill and Spencer? If Harper were to fire all the Conservative MP's that have said "Gays are bad" would he have more than 20 seats left in Parliament?
In a Vancouver Sun interview, Spencer said "legalizing homosexuality was a mistake," and he said a "well-orchestrated conspiracy had worked to advance gay rights in Canada." Spencer added, "homosexuals had deliberately infiltrated North America's courts, schools, religious communities and the entertainment industry." - Vancouver Sun November 2003
Harper acted quickly and Spencer was tossed from caucus. Spencer's crime was to expose the prevalent western conservative point of view. This view is held by many Conservative MP's but not among those that voted in their ridings in BC. Many of the rural ridings held by Conservatives would have close to a majority opposed to same-sex marriage, yet Conservatives represent areas like Burnaby, Surrey, Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, New Westminister, North and West Vancouver, the Gulf Islands all areas which would generally be more agreeable to supporting same-sex marriage than opposed to it.
Polls in BC have shown consistently that 60% of the people here support same-sex marriage. Yet with a gazillion conservative MP's surely some of them will be voting the way their constituents want them too and that would mean they would support same sex marriage. Thats not happening in BC. All but one Conservative MP is voting against the measure. Every last one of them will be lying through their teeth when they say their constituents are very much opposed to Bill 38.
I am sure they will have a comparison of emails, letters and returned surveys to back them up. All of these are unscientific measures of support. The Harper Conservatives are playing the same silly numbers game they have been for years under the Reform and Alliance banners. This likely why they will not get to Parliament in numbers to give Harper the keys to 24 Sussex Drive.
Adding to the Conservatives problems is Grant Hill from Okotoks, Alberta. Hill has the MP's pension he said he would never collect, how soon their memories go. This frees him up to say what he really thinks about gays. Here is what he told MacLeans Magazine;
"... that the homosexual lifestyle includes "distinct health negatives"; that those with an "unwanted sexual preference" can choose to change it; and that children do best when raised by straight couples. "My position is based on science, on social science, my experience as a doctor and all the data and literature that I review in a scientific way." (is there another way?)
He says more ...
"You know, there are very distinct health negatives to the gay lifestyle," he said, repeating views he made known in a Commons speech in 1996 that made him a prime target for social progressives and gay activists.
Asked to elaborate Wednesday, he said: "AIDS. AIDS in North America is 85 per cent a disease of those (men) who have sex with men."
Will Grant Hill now be sent packing by the Conservatives? Will Harper accept Hill speaking out like this? If he does what's the difference between Hill and Spencer? If Harper were to fire all the Conservative MP's that have said "Gays are bad" would he have more than 20 seats left in Parliament?
3.15.2005
Republican bites back at gay marriage opponents
Yesterday, Republican California Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer ( appointed by a republican governor) ruled the law outlawing gay marriage was unconstitutional. Extremist, far-right conservative blogs and columnists are out in force, screaming their usual uninformed, bigoted, and hypocritical outrage.
Check out Morons.org for good links to the outraged right and comments from readers!
in a related matter...
"I wish he would have spoken up earlier, I wouldn't have voted for Bush or Harper"
The Toronto Star publishes an article today by Salman Rushdie titled Keep religion out of public life. Salman Rushdie warns that West will invite tyranny if faith is given a seat in the political arena. Seems a little late for our American readers and friends, yet perfect timing for Canada. The rise of the social conservative movement in our country is still small yet they are influencing Canadian politics well beyond their size.
Check out Morons.org for good links to the outraged right and comments from readers!
in a related matter...
"I wish he would have spoken up earlier, I wouldn't have voted for Bush or Harper"
The Toronto Star publishes an article today by Salman Rushdie titled Keep religion out of public life. Salman Rushdie warns that West will invite tyranny if faith is given a seat in the political arena. Seems a little late for our American readers and friends, yet perfect timing for Canada. The rise of the social conservative movement in our country is still small yet they are influencing Canadian politics well beyond their size.
Northern BC Queer Stories needed!
Queer anthology submissions wanted, Northern BC
Want to contribue to a Queer Anthology for Prince George and surrounding country?
If you are from 100 Mile House, BC north, they want your story. Read more below on the project! If you live elsewhere now but were from the North send in your contribution of your experiance(s) there!
Dead Line: July 31st, 2005
Submit to: queeranthology@hotmail.com
Include you name, and contact information. An e-mail address is sufficient contact information. Material submitted without a name/contact info will not be published. If you wish to have your piece remain ‘anonymous’ please indicate this with your submission.
For more information you can go to Prince George Gay and Lesbian Information Services!
A yahoo place for gay men in the Prince George and Northern British Columbia area to meet for friendship, dating, relationships, encounters, chat or to exchange opinions and information. To subscribe email PGNBCGMP-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Want to contribue to a Queer Anthology for Prince George and surrounding country?
If you are from 100 Mile House, BC north, they want your story. Read more below on the project! If you live elsewhere now but were from the North send in your contribution of your experiance(s) there!
A local poet, and gay activist, is looking for poems, short stories, black and white art and photos from the Prince George, and surrounding area, Queer Community.
They submissions accepted will published together in a Chap-Book style anthology, which will hopefully be ready for sale by Prince George Pride, 2005 (September long weekend).
All profit from the book will be split 3 ways, between GALA North, Prism Film Society, and PrideUNBC.
Dead Line: July 31st, 2005
Submit to: queeranthology@hotmail.com
Include you name, and contact information. An e-mail address is sufficient contact information. Material submitted without a name/contact info will not be published. If you wish to have your piece remain ‘anonymous’ please indicate this with your submission.
For more information you can go to Prince George Gay and Lesbian Information Services!
Prince George Queer Links
Gay and Lesbian Association-North Society (GALA-North)
Positive Living North(Formerly Aids Prince George)
Prince George Gay and Lesbian Information Services
PGNBCGMP · Prince George and Northern BC Gay Men MeetingA yahoo place for gay men in the Prince George and Northern British Columbia area to meet for friendship, dating, relationships, encounters, chat or to exchange opinions and information. To subscribe email PGNBCGMP-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
3.14.2005
State's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional
Same-sex marriage in California one step closer. Here is a news story and link.
Mar 14, 2005 — SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A California Superior Court judge ruled on Monday that the state's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.
The ruling stemmed from litigation over San Francisco's decision last year to allow gay marriage. Those weddings were ruled invalid by the California Supreme Court, but the top court asked a lower court to consider the broader issue.
"We're gratified by today's ruling," said San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera. He added it was an important step toward establishing equal rights for gays in California.
Read more here.
Court invalidates California's ban on same-sex marriage San Francisco Chronicle
Judge rules state's gay-marriage ban unconstitutional
The Advocate - BBC News 193 related stories
Mar 14, 2005 — SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A California Superior Court judge ruled on Monday that the state's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.
The ruling stemmed from litigation over San Francisco's decision last year to allow gay marriage. Those weddings were ruled invalid by the California Supreme Court, but the top court asked a lower court to consider the broader issue.
"We're gratified by today's ruling," said San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera. He added it was an important step toward establishing equal rights for gays in California.
Read more here.
Court invalidates California's ban on same-sex marriage San Francisco Chronicle
Judge rules state's gay-marriage ban unconstitutional
San Jose Mercury News
The Advocate - BBC News 193 related stories
3.13.2005
Thank you Jack Layton!
Equal-Marriage, same-sex marriage or gay marriage or whatever you choose to call it is close to becoming the law across Canada. It has been a long tough road to get here and a lot of people deserve credit for this.
I am distressed however at the number of people and in particular, Queer groups falling over themselves to thank Paul Martin for bringing about marriage for all Canadians. Paul Martin is a new comer to this issue. I ask you to think of anytime before he became Prime Minister and he spoke in support of same-sex marriage.
Martin has been more than hesitant to support marriage for us. Former Prime Minister Chretien was equally hesitant, sending a proposed bill to the Supreme Court for approval ahead of time is almost unheard of and the Supreme Court sent it back telling now Prime Minister Martin, its your decision.
The political party that has been with us from the beginning has been the New Democratic Party and of the four party leaders in Parliament today, Jack Layton has been onside from day one! As is always the case in human rights and social policy issues in Canada, it is the NDP that takes up the cause, raises awareness that puts it front and centre on the political agenda.
The Liberals were hoping they could avoid the whole thing, quite like the Ontario Liberals recently in passing legislation by voice vote. The idea is to be able to have your cake and eat it too. To avoid having to say you supported marriage rights for those gay folks.
Canadians deserve more from their leaders. More from their Members of Parliament. Today the Liberal Party of Canada is struggling to avoid an identity so as to offend the fewest possible voters. The Party's motto should be, "we are not those scary Harper guys."
Same-sex marriage is already the law in eight jurisdictions in Canada. The right to marry will not change in these jurisdictions if the marriage law fails in Parliament. The Liberals are passing the legislation largely because they have too. The courts across Canada have told them so. You could argue that the Government's decision not to appeal the cases to the Supreme Court was in effect supporting our right to marry.
For me it is simply another case of the Liberals trying to appear like they are on the all sides of an issue. Liberals can run for election saying they are opposed, they can run saying they are for it, they can run and say they need time to consider it. They are all running.
I recently wrote on Stephen Harper calling his party the "The Hidden Agenda Party" due to his efforts to avoid social issues at the upcoming Conservative policy convention in Montreal. The Conservatives were trying to avoid taking a policy position on issues like gay marriage and abortion.
The Liberals are the party of slow evolution. Let time do everything. Let others lead the issue until something has to be done. Most of our social programs and rights have come about in large part due to the CCF and or the NDP taking principled positions, always ahead of the Liberals.
Don't get this wrong, I am relieved for whatever reason the Liberals use to pass a same-sex marriage law. It would be nice however if the Prime Minister could say the words gay and lesbian as much as he says religious freedom. It would be nice if the Liberals actually stood for something.
For me, I know Jack Layton and NDP policy is founded in values that are clearly stated. I know Jack has been with us all the way.
So all you members of the LGBTT2QQI communities out there, don't forget to send your thanks to Jack Layton when you are falling all over the guy that is acting out of political expediancy as much as his desire for all of us to have the right to be full Canadians.
Thank you Jack. (jack@fed.ndp.ca)
Bill Siksay, MP from Burnaby Douglas opened Same-sex marriage debate for the NDP in Parliament.
Prime Ministers Speech - Feb 16, 2005
Bloc Quebecois - "a question of citizenship"
Conservatives - "I support the traditional definition of marriage"
I am distressed however at the number of people and in particular, Queer groups falling over themselves to thank Paul Martin for bringing about marriage for all Canadians. Paul Martin is a new comer to this issue. I ask you to think of anytime before he became Prime Minister and he spoke in support of same-sex marriage.
Martin has been more than hesitant to support marriage for us. Former Prime Minister Chretien was equally hesitant, sending a proposed bill to the Supreme Court for approval ahead of time is almost unheard of and the Supreme Court sent it back telling now Prime Minister Martin, its your decision.
The political party that has been with us from the beginning has been the New Democratic Party and of the four party leaders in Parliament today, Jack Layton has been onside from day one! As is always the case in human rights and social policy issues in Canada, it is the NDP that takes up the cause, raises awareness that puts it front and centre on the political agenda.
The Liberals were hoping they could avoid the whole thing, quite like the Ontario Liberals recently in passing legislation by voice vote. The idea is to be able to have your cake and eat it too. To avoid having to say you supported marriage rights for those gay folks.
Canadians deserve more from their leaders. More from their Members of Parliament. Today the Liberal Party of Canada is struggling to avoid an identity so as to offend the fewest possible voters. The Party's motto should be, "we are not those scary Harper guys."
Same-sex marriage is already the law in eight jurisdictions in Canada. The right to marry will not change in these jurisdictions if the marriage law fails in Parliament. The Liberals are passing the legislation largely because they have too. The courts across Canada have told them so. You could argue that the Government's decision not to appeal the cases to the Supreme Court was in effect supporting our right to marry.
For me it is simply another case of the Liberals trying to appear like they are on the all sides of an issue. Liberals can run for election saying they are opposed, they can run saying they are for it, they can run and say they need time to consider it. They are all running.
I recently wrote on Stephen Harper calling his party the "The Hidden Agenda Party" due to his efforts to avoid social issues at the upcoming Conservative policy convention in Montreal. The Conservatives were trying to avoid taking a policy position on issues like gay marriage and abortion.
The Liberals are the party of slow evolution. Let time do everything. Let others lead the issue until something has to be done. Most of our social programs and rights have come about in large part due to the CCF and or the NDP taking principled positions, always ahead of the Liberals.
Don't get this wrong, I am relieved for whatever reason the Liberals use to pass a same-sex marriage law. It would be nice however if the Prime Minister could say the words gay and lesbian as much as he says religious freedom. It would be nice if the Liberals actually stood for something.
For me, I know Jack Layton and NDP policy is founded in values that are clearly stated. I know Jack has been with us all the way.
So all you members of the LGBTT2QQI communities out there, don't forget to send your thanks to Jack Layton when you are falling all over the guy that is acting out of political expediancy as much as his desire for all of us to have the right to be full Canadians.
Thank you Jack. (jack@fed.ndp.ca)
Bill Siksay, MP from Burnaby Douglas opened Same-sex marriage debate for the NDP in Parliament.
Prime Ministers Speech - Feb 16, 2005
Bloc Quebecois - "a question of citizenship"
Conservatives - "I support the traditional definition of marriage"
| Equal Marriage | |||||
Use the search box on the left for other articles here on same-sex marriage.
Okanagan gay and lesbian org on same-sex marriage
Okanagan Group states case for same-sex marriage
Support for Marriage Bill
The South Okanagan Gay and Lesbian Association (s.o.g.a.l.a.) was formed in 2002 to provide support and activities to gay, lesbian and transgendered people living their lives in the South Okanagan.
On behalf of its membership and other gay and lesbian Canadians, we would like to thank Paul Martin and his government for the courage and leadership they are showing to pass the marriage Bill. People do not have the ability to choose their sex, eye color, height etc. nor can they choose their sexual preference.
Changing the definition of marriage to be the union of two loving people is one more step towards equality for Canadians. This is the fairest and simplest way to extend those rights to all. Mr. Harper and Mr. Day, your proposal supports two different levels of Canadians in marriage.
This bill also recognizes the freedom of religion and recognizes the right of congregations to decide whether they will support same sex marriages. We ask all the members of Parliament to stand with Mr. Martin and vote yes to this Bill, which is yes to equality. We further ask all the politicians to continue down this path until there is equality on all levels for all Canadians. The passing of this bill will show the world how great it is to be Canadian.
Anyone is welcome to contact our organization through our website.
The South Okanagan Gay and Lesbian Association
QLBT Women on the Net!
QLBT Community Research Project: Queer Women on the Net - how BC and Alberta QLBT women make use of the Internet
Research Project for Queer Women
For QLBT women in Alberta and BC
QLBT Community Research Project - Queer Women on the Net: Identity, Agency and Community in the Landscapes of Computing
Participate in a QLBT Community Research Project: Queer Women on the Net: Identity, Agency and Community in the Landscapes of Computing
The Queerville.ca website outlines the main objectives of the project as:
QLBT Community Research Project
Research Project for Queer Women
For QLBT women in Alberta and BC
QLBT Community Research Project - Queer Women on the Net: Identity, Agency and Community in the Landscapes of Computing
Participate in a QLBT Community Research Project: Queer Women on the Net: Identity, Agency and Community in the Landscapes of Computing
The Queerville.ca website outlines the main objectives of the project as:
- Identify the significance of the Internet (and other media) to a diverse group of queer women/communities, and based on this knowledge;
- Work collaboratively to create or enhance local online sites, so that the Net better meets the needs of QLBT women in BC and Alberta.
QLBT Community Research Project
3.12.2005
"EX Gay" Doctor removed from board
Christian News Service reports that a major health service has removed Dr. Warren Throckmorton from its mental health board. Throckmorton believes that gay can be cured! Seems to me to be a good reason from removing him from a mental health board.
Agape Christian news is not happy
(AgapePress) - A mental health expert has been removed from an advisory panel of a large behavioral health company because of his belief that homosexuality can be changed.
Last September, Dr. Warren Throckmorton was asked to serve for a sixth year on the National Provider Advisory Committee of Magellan Health Services. But last month, Magellan retracted is offer, arguing Throckmorton's views on homosexuality were too controversial. In a recent conference call, chief medical officer Alex Rodriguez accused Throckmorton of mixing religion with mental health perspectives.
Throckmorton, a counselor and psychology professor at Grove City College in Pennsylvania, says he expected those who disagree with him to attempt to marginalize his views -- but he says he was surprised Magellan could not make a decision based on principle.
"I think it's tragic that a billion-dollar company charged with the mental health care and well being of 60 million subscribers can be, in a sense, bullied by people who disagree with client self-determination," he states.
According to Throckmorton, Dr. Rodriguez admitted to being more concerned about backlash from homosexual activists than conservatives.
"Dr. Rodriguez did not tell me that the leadership of Magellan disagreed with my views," the psychology instructor says. "In fact, he said 'I know where you're coming from.'"
Throckmorton, who has produced a video on "ex-gays" titled I Do Exist, contends the decision to remove him from the advisory panel was based on "pressure from some unnamed source" that disagreed with his view concerning clients' right to self-determine their own sexual identity.
Agape Christian news is not happy
(AgapePress) - A mental health expert has been removed from an advisory panel of a large behavioral health company because of his belief that homosexuality can be changed.
Last September, Dr. Warren Throckmorton was asked to serve for a sixth year on the National Provider Advisory Committee of Magellan Health Services. But last month, Magellan retracted is offer, arguing Throckmorton's views on homosexuality were too controversial. In a recent conference call, chief medical officer Alex Rodriguez accused Throckmorton of mixing religion with mental health perspectives.
Throckmorton, a counselor and psychology professor at Grove City College in Pennsylvania, says he expected those who disagree with him to attempt to marginalize his views -- but he says he was surprised Magellan could not make a decision based on principle.
"I think it's tragic that a billion-dollar company charged with the mental health care and well being of 60 million subscribers can be, in a sense, bullied by people who disagree with client self-determination," he states.
According to Throckmorton, Dr. Rodriguez admitted to being more concerned about backlash from homosexual activists than conservatives.
"Dr. Rodriguez did not tell me that the leadership of Magellan disagreed with my views," the psychology instructor says. "In fact, he said 'I know where you're coming from.'"
Throckmorton, who has produced a video on "ex-gays" titled I Do Exist, contends the decision to remove him from the advisory panel was based on "pressure from some unnamed source" that disagreed with his view concerning clients' right to self-determine their own sexual identity.
3.11.2005
Fred Phelps Sr accepts debate with Gay Group
Anti-gay Kansas preacher to picket play at Lincoln Museum in Indiana
The Journal Gazette says "Fred Phelps Sr., one of the most fiery anti-gay activists in the nation, is bringing his followers and their “God hates fags” picket signs to Fort Wayne. The focus of their ire will be “The Laramie Project,” a four-day run of a play about the healing of Laramie, Wyo., after the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard, who was beaten and left to die for being gay."
Local churchs and Police are working on task forces to develop contingincy plans for Phelps visit. Rob Grayless of Indiana Equality has decided to take Phelps on face to face in a forum. “We could have people stand on the other side of the street and protest right back, but that doesn’t solve anything.”
Phelps later told The Journal Gazette he intends to accept the offer. “We’ll accommodate it if it’s anywhere near reasonable,” Phelps said. “It’s just a wonderful way to show the contrast between the truth of God and the abomination of sin.”
More in the Journal Gazette
The Journal Gazette says "Fred Phelps Sr., one of the most fiery anti-gay activists in the nation, is bringing his followers and their “God hates fags” picket signs to Fort Wayne. The focus of their ire will be “The Laramie Project,” a four-day run of a play about the healing of Laramie, Wyo., after the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard, who was beaten and left to die for being gay."
Local churchs and Police are working on task forces to develop contingincy plans for Phelps visit. Rob Grayless of Indiana Equality has decided to take Phelps on face to face in a forum. “We could have people stand on the other side of the street and protest right back, but that doesn’t solve anything.”
Phelps later told The Journal Gazette he intends to accept the offer. “We’ll accommodate it if it’s anywhere near reasonable,” Phelps said. “It’s just a wonderful way to show the contrast between the truth of God and the abomination of sin.”
More in the Journal Gazette
Gay Men: Get your ACT Together
Xtra asks Who dropped the Ball?
Seems we cannot get a spot at the table because we collectively dropped the ball. A Parliamentary Sub-committee on Solicitation Laws is holding hearings across Canada and many will not be able to make presentations due to our slowness in contacting the committee for a slot on the agenda.
Libby Davis has mentioned this committee for quite awhile. I have personally received several emails from Libby on this matter and have been planning to submit a written submission.
The ball was dropped by gay men, not Libby and we can not hang it on Egale either. Many gay groups out there have a serious and compelling reason to beaware of this and should now get off their collective blame pointing fingers and get to the table any way they can! Lets bring an end to raiding of bath houses.
Read Xtra's version of who dropped the ball:
Written submissions are welcome along with presentations to the committee once it returns to Ottawa.
For information on how to make submissions to the committee or to appear before the committee in Ottawa, contact Committee Clerk Marc-Olivier Girard at sslr@parl.gc.ca or 613-944-5635.
http://www.egale.ca
MP Libby Davies 613-992-6030 daviel@parl.gc.ca
Update add on: March 13, 2005
I can think of several BC groups that should be there in person, Gayway.ca and AIDS Vancouver Island's Gay Men's program, I doubt they will however as these programs are stretched to the max on limited budgets. Both are further hindered by management and board reluctance to say anything deemed controversial. The staff in these agencies would like to do more, they just need the freedom to do it.
For gay men maybe they need to divorce themselves from AIDS groups and begin their own, where they are free to advocate for our issues and or focus on issues other than just HIV. Gayway in Vancouver is a darn good start, it needs to break free now as do other gay men's programs like the Gay Men's Community Development program at AIDS Vancouver Island.
Seems we cannot get a spot at the table because we collectively dropped the ball. A Parliamentary Sub-committee on Solicitation Laws is holding hearings across Canada and many will not be able to make presentations due to our slowness in contacting the committee for a slot on the agenda.
Libby Davis has mentioned this committee for quite awhile. I have personally received several emails from Libby on this matter and have been planning to submit a written submission.
The ball was dropped by gay men, not Libby and we can not hang it on Egale either. Many gay groups out there have a serious and compelling reason to beaware of this and should now get off their collective blame pointing fingers and get to the table any way they can! Lets bring an end to raiding of bath houses.
Read Xtra's version of who dropped the ball:
Written submissions are welcome along with presentations to the committee once it returns to Ottawa.
For information on how to make submissions to the committee or to appear before the committee in Ottawa, contact Committee Clerk Marc-Olivier Girard at sslr@parl.gc.ca or 613-944-5635.
http://www.egale.ca
MP Libby Davies 613-992-6030 daviel@parl.gc.ca
Update add on: March 13, 2005
I can think of several BC groups that should be there in person, Gayway.ca and AIDS Vancouver Island's Gay Men's program, I doubt they will however as these programs are stretched to the max on limited budgets. Both are further hindered by management and board reluctance to say anything deemed controversial. The staff in these agencies would like to do more, they just need the freedom to do it.
For gay men maybe they need to divorce themselves from AIDS groups and begin their own, where they are free to advocate for our issues and or focus on issues other than just HIV. Gayway in Vancouver is a darn good start, it needs to break free now as do other gay men's programs like the Gay Men's Community Development program at AIDS Vancouver Island.
Canadian Trans Group launches working group
The new Canadian national trans organization has established a working group that is moving forward regarding all aspects of this group.
Decisions to made include choosing a name, creating a mission statement, logo design and how the organization will work.
The working group can be found on the web at Trans Action Canada Working Group.
The group is seeking out committed transsexual/transgender and allies to help. If you can contribute log onto the site and help them get on their way!
Decisions to made include choosing a name, creating a mission statement, logo design and how the organization will work.
The working group can be found on the web at Trans Action Canada Working Group.
The group is seeking out committed transsexual/transgender and allies to help. If you can contribute log onto the site and help them get on their way!
3.10.2005
No so Fab idea
Sometimes I just have to shake my head and ask "where did that come from?"
The Federal Liberals have as always looked for every possible way they could think of to avoid having to address same-sex marriage. They have been hoping it would just go away. I read earlier today on a blog, will link it when I recall it, "the liberal have long since passed the day where they stood for anything" and it is true.
Since Jean Chrétien became Prime Minister the Liberals have been blander than Joe Clark on his dullest day and now Paul Martin is giving Robert Stanfield a go.
What sparked all this is a blog I read moments ago. One Damn Thing After Another points out that Fab Magazine in Toronto has started a postcard campaign on same-sex marriage. You send them to MP's, one has a "finger" for Stephen Harper and the other a "thank you" to Paul Martin.
Now Paul Martin would not be doing anything on same-sex marriage if he could avoid it. Its a wedge issue for him. He can get enough people to support him and label Harper a "Bad Boy" at the same time.
Thanking the man who has spent more time telling people he is defending freedom of religion rather than talking about ending the injustice the people with those religious rights want to continue against the gay communities. Hell Martin can hardly say the words gay and lesbian.
The only politician in Toronto today that has stood up for gay rights and has not been shy about joining a Pride parade is Jack Layton. Don't get me wrong, The liberals are doing the right thing, even if it hurts some of them to do so. FAB ain't so Fab today!
FAB of course is owned by a Liberal! See more of Postcards from the wedge issue at One Damn Thing After Another
The Federal Liberals have as always looked for every possible way they could think of to avoid having to address same-sex marriage. They have been hoping it would just go away. I read earlier today on a blog, will link it when I recall it, "the liberal have long since passed the day where they stood for anything" and it is true.
Since Jean Chrétien became Prime Minister the Liberals have been blander than Joe Clark on his dullest day and now Paul Martin is giving Robert Stanfield a go.
What sparked all this is a blog I read moments ago. One Damn Thing After Another points out that Fab Magazine in Toronto has started a postcard campaign on same-sex marriage. You send them to MP's, one has a "finger" for Stephen Harper and the other a "thank you" to Paul Martin.
Now Paul Martin would not be doing anything on same-sex marriage if he could avoid it. Its a wedge issue for him. He can get enough people to support him and label Harper a "Bad Boy" at the same time.
Thanking the man who has spent more time telling people he is defending freedom of religion rather than talking about ending the injustice the people with those religious rights want to continue against the gay communities. Hell Martin can hardly say the words gay and lesbian.
The only politician in Toronto today that has stood up for gay rights and has not been shy about joining a Pride parade is Jack Layton. Don't get me wrong, The liberals are doing the right thing, even if it hurts some of them to do so. FAB ain't so Fab today!
FAB of course is owned by a Liberal! See more of Postcards from the wedge issue at One Damn Thing After Another
Dining Out For Life! HIV/AIDS
Dining Out For Life! In Kelowna today!
www.livingpositive.ca
Dining Out For Life! www.livingpositive.ca
On Thursday, March 10, thousands will fill their plates to fight AIDS.
Agostino's Italian Cuisine ~ 450 Bernard Avenue
Baxter's Bar & Grill ~ 1745 Spall Road (lunch only)
Finer Choice ~ 237 Lawrence Avenue
Fresco ~ 1560 Water Street
Harvest Dining Room ~ 2725 KLO Road
Minstrel Café ~ 4638 Lakeshore Road
My Martini Place ~ 538 Leon Avenue
Siam Orchid ~ 279 Bernard Avenue (lunch only)
Staccato's ~ 421 Cawston (Rotary Centre for the Arts)
Sturgeon Hall ~ 1481 Water Street (lunch only)
Tuscany's ~ 1675 Abbott Street (Prestige Inn)
Vintropolis ~ 231 Bernard Avenue
Waterfront Wines ~ 1180 Sunset Drive
For more information about Dining Out for Life Please contact Karen Alexander at Living Positive Resource Centre Telephone: (250) 862-2437 Email: events@lprc.ca
http://www.livingpositive.ca/
www.livingpositive.ca
Dining Out For Life! www.livingpositive.ca
On Thursday, March 10, thousands will fill their plates to fight AIDS.
Agostino's Italian Cuisine ~ 450 Bernard Avenue
Baxter's Bar & Grill ~ 1745 Spall Road (lunch only)
Finer Choice ~ 237 Lawrence Avenue
Fresco ~ 1560 Water Street
Harvest Dining Room ~ 2725 KLO Road
Minstrel Café ~ 4638 Lakeshore Road
My Martini Place ~ 538 Leon Avenue
Siam Orchid ~ 279 Bernard Avenue (lunch only)
Staccato's ~ 421 Cawston (Rotary Centre for the Arts)
Sturgeon Hall ~ 1481 Water Street (lunch only)
Tuscany's ~ 1675 Abbott Street (Prestige Inn)
Vintropolis ~ 231 Bernard Avenue
Waterfront Wines ~ 1180 Sunset Drive
For more information about Dining Out for Life Please contact Karen Alexander at Living Positive Resource Centre Telephone: (250) 862-2437 Email: events@lprc.ca
http://www.livingpositive.ca/
3.09.2005
Gay Biker World ~ Blog for all you Hog riders
A good buddy of mine has entered the blogger world with the blog Gay Biker World.
Check him out a few times over the next few weeks as his blog grows.
If you are into Harley's then you are likely to enjoy the site. I expect Jim to have a pic of his big yellow Hog posted soon. If you just like good looking men, that will be there too! Jim has been leading me toward the biker heaven, perhaps by this summer I too will be a gay biker!
Check him out a few times over the next few weeks as his blog grows.
If you are into Harley's then you are likely to enjoy the site. I expect Jim to have a pic of his big yellow Hog posted soon. If you just like good looking men, that will be there too! Jim has been leading me toward the biker heaven, perhaps by this summer I too will be a gay biker!
GLBT Non-Smokers & Smokers needed for Survey!
Please participate in this groundbreaking GLBT research!!!
Non-Smokers and Smokers from the Vancouver area are encouraged to complete this 10 question survey (click on the link below)
The survey is at Proud to Quit!
It will only take 5 minutes to complete and you will be entered into our $500 cash prize draw and 10 other prize-packages ($100 value each).
Please forward this information to your friends!
Non-Smokers and Smokers from the Vancouver area are encouraged to complete this 10 question survey (click on the link below)
The survey is at Proud to Quit!
It will only take 5 minutes to complete and you will be entered into our $500 cash prize draw and 10 other prize-packages ($100 value each).
Please forward this information to your friends!
3.08.2005
BC AIDS Organizations silence lets Liberal Govt off the hook
Where is the fire that drove BC's AIDS organizations to demand health allowances for people living with HIV and got it in 2001, just to see the new Campbell Liberal government cut the allowance in half? Where is the demand for affordable housing they championed and were achieving before the last BC election, just to see the current government cancel those projects? Where is the demand for home, respite and palliative care? All of these services in BC have been cut or virtually eliminated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIDS organizations need fewer government apologists and more leaders that care about those vulnerable to HIV and or living with HIV/AIDS. Stretcher-bearers can deliver people to the door, but if there is nothing beyond the door just what is the purpose of it all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BC AIDS groups proud tradition for standing up and being effective advocates and care providers has vanished.
Responsibility for Healthcare in BC has been handed lock stock and barrel over to the health authorities. The provincial Health Minister, Finance Minister and government MLA's when asked will tell you, "We have given the money to the health authorities and they have the ability to move funds around to meet the priorities."
This practice is intended to insulate the government from responsibility or blame with the problems that exist in our healthcare system. This practice has worked very effectively for the government until the death of Barjit Bains at Surrey Memorial Hospital this past February. The Government could not shake off the fact they had repeatedly ignored reports and requests from the Fraser Health Authority for more money to alleviate serious systemic problems created by the lack of government funding.
Now as we move closer to the election, we know that many groups are being left out in the cold while others see a less than modest increase in funding. There have been modest increases in funding for some on disabilities yet this increase does little to address some of their real needs.
Today I am raising some examples of the government's crass public efforts to look as if they are doing something yet they have done nothing. Last fall they released a Crystal Meth plan. The plan is full of reasonable expectations, who should do what, how to achieve its goals yet has not one penny of new government monies to assist in achieving its goals.
Two years ago the government introduced a new HIV/AIDS document, The Priorities for Action. It acknowledges the need for prevention and education within many risk groups. Again like the crystal meth strategy, not one penny of new money is being added to achieve or implement those goals.
HIV/AIDS funding has not increased since 1994 for most organizations in our province. Agencies are being asked to do more in 2005 with 1994 dollars. It cannot be done. Most of the AIDS organizations are furious with the government's lack of action, yet are scared to speak out for fear of having their funding reduced.
Well meaning and respected people within the government service have come up with a provincial HIV/AIDS program that if implemented fully could have the plans desired effect of lowering new HIV cases from over 400 per year to 200 per year.
We will miss the goal to reduce HIV infections by a wide margin. The strategy will become an even bigger joke albeit a cruel one. It won't matter then as the current government will have won the election and can continue to blame the health authorities or simply ignore HIV/AIDS as they have for the last four years.
The catch 22 for AIDS organizations is clear. Speak out now and tell the people of our province what is happening and risk losing their funding or continue along writing reports and letters to government telling them the need for more support and with the slimmest of hopes someone in government will do the right thing.
Currently the prevailing attitude within BC’s AIDS organizations is to remain quiet. They meet together to plan action and like the government come up with plans to raise awareness in the public of the dire need for more government funding. The plans developed need then to be implemented. Now can any of you reading this recall the last time you heard publicly from AIDS organizations that they were not being provided the funding they needed?
Most AIDS organizations have capitulated. They have become nothingWhere is the fire that drove AIDS organizations to demand health allowances for people living with HIV and got it in 2001, just to see the new Campbell Liberal government cut the allowance in half? Where is the demand for affordable housing they championed and were achieving before the last BC election, just to see the current government cancel those projects? Where is the demand for home, respite and palliative care? All of these services have been cut or virtually eliminated.
more than poorly paid stretcher-bearers for government.
AIDS organizations need fewer government apologists and more leaders that care about those vulnerable to HIV and or living with HIV/AIDS. Stretcher-bearers can deliver people to the door, but if there is nothing beyond the door just what is the purpose of it all.
3.06.2005
Save our Streets from our Honourable MLA Act
Update: Another blogger asks "Why the Pissin' match Mayencourt".
"Sure there are lots of panhandlers and street people on Denman. They occasionally get a little annoying. Every so often, someone who's mentally ill will even get a little abusive. But by and large, they're polite, harmless people -- so why on earth would MLA Lorne Mayencourt get into a fight with one of them?
Save our Streets from our Honourable MLA Act
MLA Lorne Mayencourt in Vancouver got a punch in the face a week ago, from a panhandler, he alledges. Seems Lorne, the Westend partyboi decided that a panhandler in front of the coffeeshop was being too aggressive.
Lorne championed a new law intended to the throw the book at aggressive panhandlers. The Westend and downtown of Vancouver has seen a large increase in panhandlers and homeless people over the last 3 years. Many of these people are dealing with concurrent disorders of drug addiction and mental health issues. And a good number of the panhandlers are people that just cannot afford to get by in Vancouver.
Seems Lorne and his supporters, largely condo owners in units so high above the panhandlers you wonder how they actually met a panhandler, are becoming upset with seeing these poor folks on the street with the nerve to ask for some change or wash a car window in exchange for coin. Lorne worked to pass the Safe Streets Act and Trespass Act. Poverty activists, police and others told Lorne we already have laws to address aggressive panhandlers, people that assault others etc.
The law was passed anyway, now when less than 3 tickets (they fine people who panhandle for money to buy something to eat) have been issued province wide. Lorne is upset, accusing the Vancouver Police of ignoring his new law. He is furious that crown prosecuters are reluctant to take cases forward.
That's where Lorne decides he is going to force the issue. The MLA for Vancouver Burrard challenges a panhandler outside a popular coffee shop on Denman Street. He calls 911 three or four times to tell them a panhandler is being aggressive. The police do not respond in a time period appropriate for our Citizen Lorne, so he decides to make a citizens arrest.
In attempting the arrest, the honourable member of the BC Legislative Assembly receives a cut to his face and his glasses fall off according to Michael Smyth of the Vancouver province. The police arrive and an investigation ensues.
Lorne is in deep doo doo this election. He is well known for how he has failed seniors, renters and the gay community, including gay youth in our schools. He has three other claims to fame; 1. has never said no to a Liberal piece of legislation; 2. keep poor people off the streets act (Safe Streets Act) and 3. No one uses their government paid for cell phone more than he does.
Perhaps after the election we can get the government to consider a new act, The Save our Streets from our Honourable MLA Act.
"Sure there are lots of panhandlers and street people on Denman. They occasionally get a little annoying. Every so often, someone who's mentally ill will even get a little abusive. But by and large, they're polite, harmless people -- so why on earth would MLA Lorne Mayencourt get into a fight with one of them?
Save our Streets from our Honourable MLA Act
MLA Lorne Mayencourt in Vancouver got a punch in the face a week ago, from a panhandler, he alledges. Seems Lorne, the Westend partyboi decided that a panhandler in front of the coffeeshop was being too aggressive.
Lorne championed a new law intended to the throw the book at aggressive panhandlers. The Westend and downtown of Vancouver has seen a large increase in panhandlers and homeless people over the last 3 years. Many of these people are dealing with concurrent disorders of drug addiction and mental health issues. And a good number of the panhandlers are people that just cannot afford to get by in Vancouver.
Seems Lorne and his supporters, largely condo owners in units so high above the panhandlers you wonder how they actually met a panhandler, are becoming upset with seeing these poor folks on the street with the nerve to ask for some change or wash a car window in exchange for coin. Lorne worked to pass the Safe Streets Act and Trespass Act. Poverty activists, police and others told Lorne we already have laws to address aggressive panhandlers, people that assault others etc.
The law was passed anyway, now when less than 3 tickets (they fine people who panhandle for money to buy something to eat) have been issued province wide. Lorne is upset, accusing the Vancouver Police of ignoring his new law. He is furious that crown prosecuters are reluctant to take cases forward.
That's where Lorne decides he is going to force the issue. The MLA for Vancouver Burrard challenges a panhandler outside a popular coffee shop on Denman Street. He calls 911 three or four times to tell them a panhandler is being aggressive. The police do not respond in a time period appropriate for our Citizen Lorne, so he decides to make a citizens arrest.
In attempting the arrest, the honourable member of the BC Legislative Assembly receives a cut to his face and his glasses fall off according to Michael Smyth of the Vancouver province. The police arrive and an investigation ensues.
Lorne is in deep doo doo this election. He is well known for how he has failed seniors, renters and the gay community, including gay youth in our schools. He has three other claims to fame; 1. has never said no to a Liberal piece of legislation; 2. keep poor people off the streets act (Safe Streets Act) and 3. No one uses their government paid for cell phone more than he does.
Perhaps after the election we can get the government to consider a new act, The Save our Streets from our Honourable MLA Act.
3.05.2005
Anti Gay Polak's Surrey School Board left with $1.2 million legal bill
Mary Polak the likely Liberal candidate in Langley for the next election has received news that the the Surrey School Board is on the hook for over $1.2 million. This is the result of a seven year court battle to keep gay positive books our of the school libraries and classrooms.
You can read the Surrey Now report and the Surrey Leader for more. Search this site for more on Polak and her views toward homosexuality and her special relationship with out gay Liberal MLA for Vancouver Burrard, Lorne Mayencourt.
You can read the Surrey Now report and the Surrey Leader for more. Search this site for more on Polak and her views toward homosexuality and her special relationship with out gay Liberal MLA for Vancouver Burrard, Lorne Mayencourt.
3.01.2005
Another voice in the same sex marriage debate
The following letter appeared in the Kelowna Capital News February 25, 2005. I post it here in its entirety as the site will not make the story available online after a period of time.
'Justice, equality and human rights for all-I am a Canadian'
To the editor:
This is another voice in the same sex marriage debate.
From time immemorial, marriage has always been a "civil" matter regarding "property and estate" i.e. people with resources. If you had no resources you became betrothed and cohabited, period, with no need for a contract. Indeed in Canada (and elsewhere) marriage is the domain of government, the provinces. No clergy can perform a ceremony until licensed by the government and the registration of said marriage is done in a government registry, all with an eye to legality.
In the early Judeo/Christian tradition two family patriarchs agreed to a marriage where one chattel, (a woman) along with other chattels, goats, camels etc. were given to another patriarch. "Who gives this woman?" The chattel had no say in the matter. With the coming of the Industrial Revolution, the lower classes began to amass property so marriage moved down the ranks yet always remained a civil matter.
In many European countries the marriage is performed at city hall with the couple proceeding to a church to have the marriage blessed. In the 20th century Canada declared that women were now "persons" with rights of their own, they were no longer chattels. Marriage tradition evolved once again to where a "common law marriage" was seen as legally binding, with no need for a church of any kind.
Joining the religious right we now have various ethnic groups getting on the "same-sex" bandwagon in calling for traditional marriage. These are people who left other countries for Canada where freedom was more prevalent and deeply enshrined. They now seem to feel that freedom and human rights must stop with them.
It was not so long ago that, for example, Chinese Canadians could not be citizens, they obtained their rights but now wish to deny any future form of rights to gays and lesbians, forgetting that marriage is still a civil matter and is guaranteed under the Charter of Rights.
I suggest the proponents of traditional marriage make themselves clear as to what tradition they are referring to because there are many. Are women once more no longer to be persons? Must they revert to being "subject to their husbands," i.e. evangelical Christians? What about polygamy in the Kootenays? Why haven't the traditional marriage proponents demonstrated against those values? Are marriages in Canada now to be arranged? (i.e. Hindi and Sikh) Are reproductive rights to be controlled as in China? Are women now to be even less than chattels as in Muslim extremism? Must we return to traditional times, when Roman Catholics could only marry Roman Catholics, Jews marry Jews, Sikhs marry Sikhs?
Those are just some of the traditions and they all deny human rights.No government is going to force any religious expression to act in a manner they feel inappropriate. We have marriage commissioners who will perform the ceremony as a civil matter. If the various denominations feel their rights should be respected, then should it not follow that all rights need to be respected.I have seen the evolution of human rights in Canada to where they are a true expression of being Canadian. The corollary being that human rights in the USA and elsewhere are rapidly being eroded.
I feel that all of us should take a leaf out of Joe the Canadian (TM) beer spokes persons book, and stand tall and proud shouting to the world: "I believe in justice, equality and human rights for all, my name is Ted and I am Canadian!"
Rev. E.C. (Ted) Roworth,
Enderby BC
'Justice, equality and human rights for all-I am a Canadian'
To the editor:
This is another voice in the same sex marriage debate.
From time immemorial, marriage has always been a "civil" matter regarding "property and estate" i.e. people with resources. If you had no resources you became betrothed and cohabited, period, with no need for a contract. Indeed in Canada (and elsewhere) marriage is the domain of government, the provinces. No clergy can perform a ceremony until licensed by the government and the registration of said marriage is done in a government registry, all with an eye to legality.
In the early Judeo/Christian tradition two family patriarchs agreed to a marriage where one chattel, (a woman) along with other chattels, goats, camels etc. were given to another patriarch. "Who gives this woman?" The chattel had no say in the matter. With the coming of the Industrial Revolution, the lower classes began to amass property so marriage moved down the ranks yet always remained a civil matter.
In many European countries the marriage is performed at city hall with the couple proceeding to a church to have the marriage blessed. In the 20th century Canada declared that women were now "persons" with rights of their own, they were no longer chattels. Marriage tradition evolved once again to where a "common law marriage" was seen as legally binding, with no need for a church of any kind.
Joining the religious right we now have various ethnic groups getting on the "same-sex" bandwagon in calling for traditional marriage. These are people who left other countries for Canada where freedom was more prevalent and deeply enshrined. They now seem to feel that freedom and human rights must stop with them.
It was not so long ago that, for example, Chinese Canadians could not be citizens, they obtained their rights but now wish to deny any future form of rights to gays and lesbians, forgetting that marriage is still a civil matter and is guaranteed under the Charter of Rights.
I suggest the proponents of traditional marriage make themselves clear as to what tradition they are referring to because there are many. Are women once more no longer to be persons? Must they revert to being "subject to their husbands," i.e. evangelical Christians? What about polygamy in the Kootenays? Why haven't the traditional marriage proponents demonstrated against those values? Are marriages in Canada now to be arranged? (i.e. Hindi and Sikh) Are reproductive rights to be controlled as in China? Are women now to be even less than chattels as in Muslim extremism? Must we return to traditional times, when Roman Catholics could only marry Roman Catholics, Jews marry Jews, Sikhs marry Sikhs?
Those are just some of the traditions and they all deny human rights.No government is going to force any religious expression to act in a manner they feel inappropriate. We have marriage commissioners who will perform the ceremony as a civil matter. If the various denominations feel their rights should be respected, then should it not follow that all rights need to be respected.I have seen the evolution of human rights in Canada to where they are a true expression of being Canadian. The corollary being that human rights in the USA and elsewhere are rapidly being eroded.
I feel that all of us should take a leaf out of Joe the Canadian (TM) beer spokes persons book, and stand tall and proud shouting to the world: "I believe in justice, equality and human rights for all, my name is Ted and I am Canadian!"
Rev. E.C. (Ted) Roworth,
Enderby BC
Another voice in the same sex marriage debate
The following letter appeared in the Kelowna Capital News February 25, 2005. I post it here in its entirety as the site will not make the story available online after a period of time.
'Justice, equality and human rights for all-I am a Canadian'
To the editor:
This is another voice in the same sex marriage debate.
From time immemorial, marriage has always been a "civil" matter regarding "property and estate" i.e. people with resources. If you had no resources you became betrothed and cohabited, period, with no need for a contract. Indeed in Canada (and elsewhere) marriage is the domain of government, the provinces. No clergy can perform a ceremony until licensed by the government and the registration of said marriage is done in a government registry, all with an eye to legality.
In the early Judeo/Christian tradition two family patriarchs agreed to a marriage where one chattel, (a woman) along with other chattels, goats, camels etc. were given to another patriarch. "Who gives this woman?" The chattel had no say in the matter. With the coming of the Industrial Revolution, the lower classes began to amass property so marriage moved down the ranks yet always remained a civil matter.
In many European countries the marriage is performed at city hall with the couple proceeding to a church to have the marriage blessed. In the 20th century Canada declared that women were now "persons" with rights of their own, they were no longer chattels. Marriage tradition evolved once again to where a "common law marriage" was seen as legally binding, with no need for a church of any kind.
Joining the religious right we now have various ethnic groups getting on the "same-sex" bandwagon in calling for traditional marriage. These are people who left other countries for Canada where freedom was more prevalent and deeply enshrined. They now seem to feel that freedom and human rights must stop with them.
It was not so long ago that, for example, Chinese Canadians could not be citizens, they obtained their rights but now wish to deny any future form of rights to gays and lesbians, forgetting that marriage is still a civil matter and is guaranteed under the Charter of Rights.
I suggest the proponents of traditional marriage make themselves clear as to what tradition they are referring to because there are many. Are women once more no longer to be persons? Must they revert to being "subject to their husbands," i.e. evangelical Christians? What about polygamy in the Kootenays? Why haven't the traditional marriage proponents demonstrated against those values? Are marriages in Canada now to be arranged? (i.e. Hindi and Sikh) Are reproductive rights to be controlled as in China? Are women now to be even less than chattels as in Muslim extremism? Must we return to traditional times, when Roman Catholics could only marry Roman Catholics, Jews marry Jews, Sikhs marry Sikhs?
Those are just some of the traditions and they all deny human rights.No government is going to force any religious expression to act in a manner they feel inappropriate. We have marriage commissioners who will perform the ceremony as a civil matter. If the various denominations feel their rights should be respected, then should it not follow that all rights need to be respected.I have seen the evolution of human rights in Canada to where they are a true expression of being Canadian. The corollary being that human rights in the USA and elsewhere are rapidly being eroded.
I feel that all of us should take a leaf out of Joe the Canadian (TM) beer spokes persons book, and stand tall and proud shouting to the world: "I believe in justice, equality and human rights for all, my name is Ted and I am Canadian!"
Rev. E.C. (Ted) Roworth,
Enderby BC
'Justice, equality and human rights for all-I am a Canadian'
To the editor:
This is another voice in the same sex marriage debate.
From time immemorial, marriage has always been a "civil" matter regarding "property and estate" i.e. people with resources. If you had no resources you became betrothed and cohabited, period, with no need for a contract. Indeed in Canada (and elsewhere) marriage is the domain of government, the provinces. No clergy can perform a ceremony until licensed by the government and the registration of said marriage is done in a government registry, all with an eye to legality.
In the early Judeo/Christian tradition two family patriarchs agreed to a marriage where one chattel, (a woman) along with other chattels, goats, camels etc. were given to another patriarch. "Who gives this woman?" The chattel had no say in the matter. With the coming of the Industrial Revolution, the lower classes began to amass property so marriage moved down the ranks yet always remained a civil matter.
In many European countries the marriage is performed at city hall with the couple proceeding to a church to have the marriage blessed. In the 20th century Canada declared that women were now "persons" with rights of their own, they were no longer chattels. Marriage tradition evolved once again to where a "common law marriage" was seen as legally binding, with no need for a church of any kind.
Joining the religious right we now have various ethnic groups getting on the "same-sex" bandwagon in calling for traditional marriage. These are people who left other countries for Canada where freedom was more prevalent and deeply enshrined. They now seem to feel that freedom and human rights must stop with them.
It was not so long ago that, for example, Chinese Canadians could not be citizens, they obtained their rights but now wish to deny any future form of rights to gays and lesbians, forgetting that marriage is still a civil matter and is guaranteed under the Charter of Rights.
I suggest the proponents of traditional marriage make themselves clear as to what tradition they are referring to because there are many. Are women once more no longer to be persons? Must they revert to being "subject to their husbands," i.e. evangelical Christians? What about polygamy in the Kootenays? Why haven't the traditional marriage proponents demonstrated against those values? Are marriages in Canada now to be arranged? (i.e. Hindi and Sikh) Are reproductive rights to be controlled as in China? Are women now to be even less than chattels as in Muslim extremism? Must we return to traditional times, when Roman Catholics could only marry Roman Catholics, Jews marry Jews, Sikhs marry Sikhs?
Those are just some of the traditions and they all deny human rights.No government is going to force any religious expression to act in a manner they feel inappropriate. We have marriage commissioners who will perform the ceremony as a civil matter. If the various denominations feel their rights should be respected, then should it not follow that all rights need to be respected.I have seen the evolution of human rights in Canada to where they are a true expression of being Canadian. The corollary being that human rights in the USA and elsewhere are rapidly being eroded.
I feel that all of us should take a leaf out of Joe the Canadian (TM) beer spokes persons book, and stand tall and proud shouting to the world: "I believe in justice, equality and human rights for all, my name is Ted and I am Canadian!"
Rev. E.C. (Ted) Roworth,
Enderby BC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)